<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6272/Dac &#8211; easy but nice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[neildubya]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neildubya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=73#comment-146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with Peter. The Indie crossword is way out in front right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with Peter. The Indie crossword is way out in front right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=73#comment-145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I changed a couple of months ago from doing Times and Guardian every day and Indie on Sat, to Times and Indie with the Guardian as a Sat-only extra.  I miss some of the Guardian setters, esp. those not available in Times or Indie, but so far the Indie hardly ever serves up a puzzle I&#039;m unimpressed by.  I was getting to the point in the Guardian where rather unfairly to some of their setters, I&#039;d only bother with my favourite half dozen or so.  So for me, it was time for a change.  The real test of the Indie will be whether I&#039;m still doing their puzzle every day in a decade or two...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed a couple of months ago from doing Times and Guardian every day and Indie on Sat, to Times and Indie with the Guardian as a Sat-only extra.  I miss some of the Guardian setters, esp. those not available in Times or Indie, but so far the Indie hardly ever serves up a puzzle I&#8217;m unimpressed by.  I was getting to the point in the Guardian where rather unfairly to some of their setters, I&#8217;d only bother with my favourite half dozen or so.  So for me, it was time for a change.  The real test of the Indie will be whether I&#8217;m still doing their puzzle every day in a decade or two&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[loubert]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[loubert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=73#comment-144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, with a few obvious exceptions - some of whom set for both papers - would we be in agreement that the Independent is generally the better of the two crosswords these days?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, with a few obvious exceptions &#8211; some of whom set for both papers &#8211; would we be in agreement that the Independent is generally the better of the two crosswords these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[tilsit]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tilsit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=73#comment-143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dac has a really nice cluing style that fits well with the Indy -  nice contemporary references with a little humour and a pleasant challenge.

Unlike the Guardian&#039;s Chifonie, whom I find dour and a hark back to the puzzles of Lavengro and so on in the 80&#039;s.  No real feeling of satifaction when you finish it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dac has a really nice cluing style that fits well with the Indy &#8211;  nice contemporary references with a little humour and a pleasant challenge.</p>
<p>Unlike the Guardian&#8217;s Chifonie, whom I find dour and a hark back to the puzzles of Lavengro and so on in the 80&#8242;s.  No real feeling of satifaction when you finish it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[nmsindy]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/11/22/independent-6272dac-easy-but-nice/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nmsindy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=73#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, this was excellent as usual from Dac.    Though I did not solve any acrosses on first reading, the downs were easier, and I finished in 19 mins , about average for me for Dac.   Always a pleasure to work out a new word just from the wordplay as I did with CROUSTADE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this was excellent as usual from Dac.    Though I did not solve any acrosses on first reading, the downs were easier, and I finished in 19 mins , about average for me for Dac.   Always a pleasure to work out a new word just from the wordplay as I did with CROUSTADE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
