<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6289 by Virgilius &#8211; Poets aplenty!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/12/12/independent-6289-by-virgilius-poets-aplenty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/12/12/independent-6289-by-virgilius-poets-aplenty/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/12/12/independent-6289-by-virgilius-poets-aplenty/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=117#comment-403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Checking is part of it: this one has 50% checking in every answer in the Times manner.  The other aspect is interconnections between parts of the grid.  If you can draw a line isolating a large part of the grid from the rest, which only goes through one white square (or two white squares which are &quot;symmetry buddies&quot;), that&#039;s usually counted as a weakness.  Yesterday&#039;s Indie grid was a bit weak in this way - without the 4 12-letter answers, you&#039;ve got 4 mini-puzzles.   You can&#039;t find a set of linking answers like this in today&#039;s grid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checking is part of it: this one has 50% checking in every answer in the Times manner.  The other aspect is interconnections between parts of the grid.  If you can draw a line isolating a large part of the grid from the rest, which only goes through one white square (or two white squares which are &#8220;symmetry buddies&#8221;), that&#8217;s usually counted as a weakness.  Yesterday&#8217;s Indie grid was a bit weak in this way &#8211; without the 4 12-letter answers, you&#8217;ve got 4 mini-puzzles.   You can&#8217;t find a set of linking answers like this in today&#8217;s grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[neildubya]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/12/12/independent-6289-by-virgilius-poets-aplenty/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neildubya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=117#comment-402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grid construction is something of a blind spot for me - could you explain what you mean by &quot;impeccable&quot;? Is it basically to do with the amount of checking for each answer?

Took me a while to spot Kipling too, probably because I don&#039;t usually think of him as a poet (can&#039;t stand &quot;If...&quot;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grid construction is something of a blind spot for me &#8211; could you explain what you mean by &#8220;impeccable&#8221;? Is it basically to do with the amount of checking for each answer?</p>
<p>Took me a while to spot Kipling too, probably because I don&#8217;t usually think of him as a poet (can&#8217;t stand &#8220;If&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2006/12/12/independent-6289-by-virgilius-poets-aplenty/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=117#comment-401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another gem in the Virgilius thematic series.  Nice and easy, so kicked myself for not spotting Kipling at 1A immediately, which might have given a very quick time.  And as well as the other words being &quot;ordinary cryptic material&quot;, the grid was impeccable too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another gem in the Virgilius thematic series.  Nice and easy, so kicked myself for not spotting Kipling at 1A immediately, which might have given a very quick time.  And as well as the other words being &#8220;ordinary cryptic material&#8221;, the grid was impeccable too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
