Comments on: Independent 6311/Hypnos http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/01/08/independent-6311hypnos/ Never knowingly undersolved. Thu, 23 May 2013 16:44:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: <![CDATA[nmsindy]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/01/08/independent-6311hypnos/#comment-627 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:22:34 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=175#comment-627 I’d doubts about “dust” too. Though it was a change from try coming off industry. I think pure = modest = chaste, say.

]]> By: <![CDATA[Quixote]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/01/08/independent-6311hypnos/#comment-626 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:16:38 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=175#comment-626 It’s IN DUST that means neglected I reckon

]]> By: <![CDATA[Wil Ransome]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/01/08/independent-6311hypnos/#comment-625 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:33:31 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=175#comment-625 In INDUS, why is “dust” = “neglected”?

And I agree, “pure” = “modest” (18A) seems doubtful.

Wil Ransome

]]> By: <![CDATA[nmsindy]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/01/08/independent-6311hypnos/#comment-624 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:17:15 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=175#comment-624 8 dn BU(n) + SMALL* + TIFF. Good puzzle, well-crafted clues, 17 mins for me

]]>