http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/03/09/independent-6363phi/ Never knowingly undersolved. Fri, 24 May 2013 17:01:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/03/09/independent-6363phi/#comment-1438 Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:15:03 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=324#comment-1438 I’d just like to point out that there was no collusion between Phi in setting this puzzle and me in composing the headline for Wednesday’s belated blog – Paul: Came unstuck, mea culpa. Mate grinds like a think!

]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/03/09/independent-6363phi/#comment-1437 Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:10:53 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=324#comment-1437 Also plumped for ADVICE for the same reason, trusting Phi enough not to worry at all, and noting the question mark in the clue.

]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/03/09/independent-6363phi/#comment-1436 Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:56:09 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=324#comment-1436 I found this quite easy, but had one major doubt 23 “Counsel offering intrerpretation of excessive hype”. Was it ADVICE or ADVISE? I settled for the former on the basis of AD VICE but not quite sure. Rather unusual approach. There would be few setters better qualified to clue ASTRONOMER because Phi is one, per Azed’s recent book.

]]>