<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6481 / Dac  Solid stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/25/independent-6481-dac-work-in-progress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/25/independent-6481-dac-work-in-progress/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: petebiddlecombe</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/25/independent-6481-dac-work-in-progress/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>petebiddlecombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/25/independent-6481-dac-work-in-progress/#comment-3285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite surprised to see Hailsham, but easy enough as I used to live in Eastbourne.  Best way for others to get it is probably to realise that the Hailsam in &quot;Lord Hailsham&quot; was a toponym.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite surprised to see Hailsham, but easy enough as I used to live in Eastbourne.  Best way for others to get it is probably to realise that the Hailsam in &#8220;Lord Hailsham&#8221; was a toponym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/25/independent-6481-dac-work-in-progress/#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/25/independent-6481-dac-work-in-progress/#comment-3258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. as you say, you always are satisfied by a Dac puzzle.   I found this a little harder than usual.   Cunning things that tricked me were (1) in 19 was looking for a synonym of bed (e.g. cot) whereas it was the word itself and (2) 21 across where similarly new = new not n!   Re 16 down, which I liked a lot, and again was tantalisingly misleading, I read the wordplay as PRO MISER.   I had to confirm HAILSHAM too, but the wordplay was very clear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. as you say, you always are satisfied by a Dac puzzle.   I found this a little harder than usual.   Cunning things that tricked me were (1) in 19 was looking for a synonym of bed (e.g. cot) whereas it was the word itself and (2) 21 across where similarly new = new not n!   Re 16 down, which I liked a lot, and again was tantalisingly misleading, I read the wordplay as PRO MISER.   I had to confirm HAILSHAM too, but the wordplay was very clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
