Comments on: Independent 6483/Phi http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/ Never knowingly undersolved. Fri, 24 May 2013 00:14:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: neildubya http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3312 neildubya Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:39:11 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3312 Phi always seems to be on top form but I thought this one was especially good.

]]> By: Colin Blackburn http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3311 Colin Blackburn Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:29:34 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3311 Thanks to both for the explanation of TELETHON. I convinced myself about ELE(ven) and so failed to see TE(am).

Yes, the clue to QUAKER was good as were several of the ones I neglected to comment upon.

]]> By: Wil Ransome http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3305 Wil Ransome Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:19:15 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3305 TELETHON: Te(am)+ h in let on, defn. ‘long programme’.

I couldn’t see why it was a pangram since I couldn’t find a Q. But that was because I had a quite unjustifiable MUCKER instead of QUAKER.

]]> By: nmsindy http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3304 nmsindy Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:06:45 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/27/independent-6483phi/#comment-3304 Yes, it was a pangram which made it a bit harder than usual from Phi. TELETHON – TE(am) LET (H) ON ie let on. Really liked the clue to Quaker, which made me suspect a pangram.

]]>