<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inquisitor 40 &#8211; New Broom by Dimitry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/10/15/inquisitor-40-new-broom-by-dimitry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/10/15/inquisitor-40-new-broom-by-dimitry/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joins</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/10/15/inquisitor-40-new-broom-by-dimitry/#comment-6036</link>
		<dc:creator>Joins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/10/15/inquisitor-40-new-broom-by-dimitry/#comment-6036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember we had to clean up the theme words with the letter n (for new) i.e. a &#039;new&#039; broom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember we had to clean up the theme words with the letter n (for new) i.e. a &#8216;new&#8217; broom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Shiell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2007/10/15/inquisitor-40-new-broom-by-dimitry/#comment-5825</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Shiell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/10/15/inquisitor-40-new-broom-by-dimitry/#comment-5825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it has to be SHIT

Sample, less ample (large enough), leads to S

and

lucky chance leads to HIT

One of the definitions of SHIT in Chambers is rubbish.  Indeed I think all thirteen had rubbish as a definition in Chambers.

This was another splendid Inquisitor after Vital Plan the previous week where I fell at the final hurdle by having six letters left and trying to apply four of them to the wrong two words (Key and Wheeze) rather than solving Denis and Dons.  I was compeletely fixated on key and wheeze being part of the thirteen requiring association with two characters and just didn&#039;t step back and look at the bigger picture (Vital Plan and Kiwis).  Not surprisingly I couldn&#039;t get DEN_S and DO_S to link into New Zealand either!

At the moment I find Inquisitors generally more satisfying than some some Listeners, but I suspect that is partly down to my lack of enough experience with Listeners.

Duncan Shiell]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has to be SHIT</p>
<p>Sample, less ample (large enough), leads to S</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>lucky chance leads to HIT</p>
<p>One of the definitions of SHIT in Chambers is rubbish.  Indeed I think all thirteen had rubbish as a definition in Chambers.</p>
<p>This was another splendid Inquisitor after Vital Plan the previous week where I fell at the final hurdle by having six letters left and trying to apply four of them to the wrong two words (Key and Wheeze) rather than solving Denis and Dons.  I was compeletely fixated on key and wheeze being part of the thirteen requiring association with two characters and just didn&#8217;t step back and look at the bigger picture (Vital Plan and Kiwis).  Not surprisingly I couldn&#8217;t get DEN_S and DO_S to link into New Zealand either!</p>
<p>At the moment I find Inquisitors generally more satisfying than some some Listeners, but I suspect that is partly down to my lack of enough experience with Listeners.</p>
<p>Duncan Shiell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
