Posted by rightback on 5th January 2008
Solving time: 4:42
Araucaria has had a monopoly on the prize crosswords in recent weeks, so this was a nice change and probably my quickest time for a Paul puzzle. The theme was fairly straightforward, comprising 5 clues consisting of single words backwards (“kcul?”, “ylper?”, “ytud?”, “eert?” and “tew?”), leading to solutions with ‘wordplay in the answer’. I was helped enormously by spotting the answer to the longest of these (“kcul?”) immediately, and by knowing the phrase ‘neap tide’ which I solved next.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | No Comments »
Posted by ilancaron on 5th January 2008
Not being an expert on Azed xmas specials, can’t tell if this is par for the course or a lot harder. In any event, I needed to resort to an email friend (PB) to get jump-started. Must be said that this is a tour de force in terms of integration. And I wonder if the misprinted letters themselves form a theme somehow (anagram or acrostic). The first task in solving is to identify the quadrants… so I’ve organized this blog thus. But still came up short in 3 clues… Thanks to Andrew and Roland now cleared up.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Azed | 15 Comments »
Posted by tilsit on 5th January 2008
Solving time: 19 minutes
A thoroughly enjoyable puzzle from Shed, an under-used and underrated setter on the Guardian, in my opinion. Always a nice mixture of excellent clues with one or two twists on old favourites (e,g, torchlit in 1 across, and the working for 17 across)..
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 2 Comments »
Posted by smiffy on 5th January 2008
I enjoyed this puzzle, which featured several satisfyingly penny-dropping clues – primarily due to some well disguised definitions and very natural surfaces. The Cinephile cross-reference at 5D led me up a couple of blind alleys too. Just a pity that I didn’t get around to solving this until the evening (Uncle Sam Time), so was unable to post earlier in the day.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | No Comments »