<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6624 by Dac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/#comment-11450</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/#comment-11450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KENDAL (1D)

This seems to be as explained by nmsindy.  But if so, it seems a bit odd: &quot;...overlooking valley appears endless&quot; arguably doesn&#039;t give DALe, for the grammar is wrong for that: &quot;valley&quot; is the object in &quot;Range overlooking valley&quot; and the subject in &quot;valley appears endless&quot;.  And why didn&#039;t Dac simply say &quot;Range overlooking endless valley ...&quot;?  I suspect I&#039;m missing something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KENDAL (1D)</p>
<p>This seems to be as explained by nmsindy.  But if so, it seems a bit odd: &#8220;&#8230;overlooking valley appears endless&#8221; arguably doesn&#8217;t give DALe, for the grammar is wrong for that: &#8220;valley&#8221; is the object in &#8220;Range overlooking valley&#8221; and the subject in &#8220;valley appears endless&#8221;.  And why didn&#8217;t Dac simply say &#8220;Range overlooking endless valley &#8230;&#8221;?  I suspect I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/#comment-11440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/#comment-11440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was making excellent progress until the &#039;new&#039; in 17ac convinced me that there was at least a partial anagram to solve, swiftly followed by a pencilled in FIRST for the first word in 15d, and I got a bit stuck. By the time I&#039;d got DEMONSTRATOR, lunchtime had come and gone...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was making excellent progress until the &#8216;new&#8217; in 17ac convinced me that there was at least a partial anagram to solve, swiftly followed by a pencilled in FIRST for the first word in 15d, and I got a bit stuck. By the time I&#8217;d got DEMONSTRATOR, lunchtime had come and gone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/#comment-11439</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/09/independent-6624-by-dac/#comment-11439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I interpret 17 slightly differently.  &quot;I&quot; is the &quot;hat&quot; for the word IDLER (i.e. the top when written downwards) so encrusting it with Ds for diamonds gives (D)I(D)DLER.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I interpret 17 slightly differently.  &#8220;I&#8221; is the &#8220;hat&#8221; for the word IDLER (i.e. the top when written downwards) so encrusting it with Ds for diamonds gives (D)I(D)DLER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
