Comments on: Guardian 24,295 (Sat 26 Jan)/Araucaria – Whodunnit? http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/ Never knowingly undersolved. Wed, 22 May 2013 14:08:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: beermagnet http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/#comment-13202 beermagnet Sat, 02 Feb 2008 13:00:18 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/#comment-13202 6D I reckon R for Royal is OK as it is used in abbreviations such as HRH His/her Royal Highness. For the definition I took the idea to be that heirlooms need to stay in the home else they cease to be heirlooms, almost by definition.

]]> By: rightback http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/#comment-13182 rightback Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:22:15 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/#comment-13182 14A – that makes sense. I thought there must be a bit more to the theme than I’d seen.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/#comment-13181 Andrew Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:19:37 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/02/guardian-24295-sat-26-janaraucaria-whodunnit/#comment-13181 14A – the “creators” are the detective story writers, whose work is about what happens after a death.

6D – I assumed it meant that heirlooms should stay at home (rather than being sold for a fortune at Sotheby’s, say), though that seems pretty weak.

]]>