Comments on: Independent 6668/Phi http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/ Never knowingly undersolved. Wed, 22 May 2013 16:06:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Wil Ransome http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15870 Wil Ransome Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:14:13 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15870 The fact that in 11A you called him Tolkein and not Tolkien hasn’t in this case been a problem. Lots of people call him Tolkein.

Sorry to be pedantic. Just thought I’d point it out.

]]> By: Wil Ransome http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15695 Wil Ransome Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:06:48 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15695 I had the same doubts as Testy over the equivalence of credibility and confidence. And yes an unusually difficult Phi, I thought. It took me ages to get 4A, 5D (my writing in AUREOLE didn’t help), 10A and 6D.

]]> By: Jon http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15670 Jon Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:59:37 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15670 Bit more difficult than usual for Phi, I thought? 12ac caused me far greater problems than it should have…

]]> By: Testy http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15668 Testy Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:28:58 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/2008/02/29/independent-6668phi/#comment-15668 I really liked “low intelligence” for MOO NOUS (I really must get more used to thinking MOO whenever I see “low”).

My only real quibble was with CREDIBILITY being clued by “confidence”, are they the same?

]]>