<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24,395 &#8211; Araucaria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:01:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Yap</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-28227</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Yap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 08:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-28227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Chapter VI of Ximenes 0n the art of the crossword by D.S.Macnutt,  &quot;seven main headings&quot; were mentioned -
1. Two or more meanings
2. Reversals
3. Charades
4. Containers and contents
5. Puns
6. Anagrams
7. Hidden

Don Manley&#039;s equally excellent book The Crossword Guide published by Chambers has these categories
1. Anagrams (Chapter 4)
2. Charades (Chapter 5)
3. Containers and contents
4. Reversals
5. Hidden words (Chapter 6)
6. Vocal clues
7. Subtractive clues

Charade has been and always will be a significant category of clues. Other bloggers may not exactly have used the word &quot;charade&quot; but they do allude to the device.

I happen to think that I should also address my blog to newbies who may not understand such notations as S-WEE-NEY (for 2Down) which only a seasoned and experienced solver can comprehend. Hence my long explanation spelling out the wordplay in detail and pointing out obscure definitions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Chapter VI of Ximenes 0n the art of the crossword by D.S.Macnutt,  &#8220;seven main headings&#8221; were mentioned -<br />
1. Two or more meanings<br />
2. Reversals<br />
3. Charades<br />
4. Containers and contents<br />
5. Puns<br />
6. Anagrams<br />
7. Hidden</p>
<p>Don Manley&#8217;s equally excellent book The Crossword Guide published by Chambers has these categories<br />
1. Anagrams (Chapter 4)<br />
2. Charades (Chapter 5)<br />
3. Containers and contents<br />
4. Reversals<br />
5. Hidden words (Chapter 6)<br />
6. Vocal clues<br />
7. Subtractive clues</p>
<p>Charade has been and always will be a significant category of clues. Other bloggers may not exactly have used the word &#8220;charade&#8221; but they do allude to the device.</p>
<p>I happen to think that I should also address my blog to newbies who may not understand such notations as S-WEE-NEY (for 2Down) which only a seasoned and experienced solver can comprehend. Hence my long explanation spelling out the wordplay in detail and pointing out obscure definitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-28119</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-28119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t know &#039;charade&#039; as a Ximenean category and it doesn&#039;t appear to be used by most bloggers. Mr Google informed me that &#039;Ximenes on the Art of the Crossword&#039;, long out of print, has now been reissued. Are Ximenes&#039; rules available elsewhere?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know &#8216;charade&#8217; as a Ximenean category and it doesn&#8217;t appear to be used by most bloggers. Mr Google informed me that &#8216;Ximenes on the Art of the Crossword&#8217;, long out of print, has now been reissued. Are Ximenes&#8217; rules available elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27994</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charades is one of the seven main headings of Ximenes&#039; types of clues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charades is one of the seven main headings of Ximenes&#8217; types of clues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27970</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done, Uncle Yap. I hadn&#039;t seen &#039;charade&#039; used before to describe a crossword clue, but Chambers defines it as &#039;a species of riddle, the subject of which is a word proposed for solution from an enigmatical description of its component syllables and of the whole&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Uncle Yap. I hadn&#8217;t seen &#8216;charade&#8217; used before to describe a crossword clue, but Chambers defines it as &#8216;a species of riddle, the subject of which is a word proposed for solution from an enigmatical description of its component syllables and of the whole&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michod</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27962</link>
		<dc:creator>Michod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done indeed. I had a lot of trouble with this, not helped by putting SUNDOWNER instead of LANDOWNER at first. I guessed KERYGMA, GUERDON (eventually) and REGULAR, but didn&#039;t get WARRANT and WIPER. I&#039;ll blame my superior knowledge of London postal districts for missing 5 down (thosh she probably owns half of W1, even if she doesn&#039;t live there), but 5 across is very good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done indeed. I had a lot of trouble with this, not helped by putting SUNDOWNER instead of LANDOWNER at first. I guessed KERYGMA, GUERDON (eventually) and REGULAR, but didn&#8217;t get WARRANT and WIPER. I&#8217;ll blame my superior knowledge of London postal districts for missing 5 down (thosh she probably owns half of W1, even if she doesn&#8217;t live there), but 5 across is very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27949</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this puzzle mostly quite easy, apart from a couple of obscurities: I had to look up KERYGMA and didn&#039;t know about Cade&#039;s rebellion.  

I guessed OPUS DEI almost immediately: it&#039;s been in the public eye fairly recently as a result of featuring in &quot;The Da Vinci Code&quot;, and also because Ruth Kelly is a member - a fact that caused some controversy when she was dealing with &quot;faith schools&quot; as Secretary of State for education, as well as speculation as to whether she wears the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cilice&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cilice&lt;/a&gt; (barbed-wire underwear, basically).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this puzzle mostly quite easy, apart from a couple of obscurities: I had to look up KERYGMA and didn&#8217;t know about Cade&#8217;s rebellion.  </p>
<p>I guessed OPUS DEI almost immediately: it&#8217;s been in the public eye fairly recently as a result of featuring in &#8220;The Da Vinci Code&#8221;, and also because Ruth Kelly is a member &#8211; a fact that caused some controversy when she was dealing with &#8220;faith schools&#8221; as Secretary of State for education, as well as speculation as to whether she wears the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cilice" rel="nofollow">cilice</a> (barbed-wire underwear, basically).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27935</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Andrew and Geoff. I didn&#039;t spot the second &#039;12&#039;.

Remembered from primary school: the legend is that Blondel &#039;discovered&#039; the Lionheart, who had been captured by Duke Leopold of Austria, by travelling Europe from castle to castle, singing a love-song that they had composed together. When he reached the castle where Richard was imprisoned, he heard the king singing the refrain. Subsequently, Richard was ransomed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andrew and Geoff. I didn&#8217;t spot the second &#8217;12&#8242;.</p>
<p>Remembered from primary school: the legend is that Blondel &#8216;discovered&#8217; the Lionheart, who had been captured by Duke Leopold of Austria, by travelling Europe from castle to castle, singing a love-song that they had composed together. When he reached the castle where Richard was imprisoned, he heard the king singing the refrain. Subsequently, Richard was ransomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27934</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;12&#039; appears twice in clue for 17ac, so Uncle Yap&#039;s explanation must be right.

5dn - this must be Araucaria&#039;s mistake, although I worked out the clue assuming the postal district of Buckingham Palace was W1.

17dn - KERYGMA was a new word to me (I recognise GUERDON from crosswords!) but it was fairly obvious from the wordplay and had an authentic Greek look to it.  Another good example of a relatively easy clue for a relatively difficult word.

Satisfying example of the good Rev&#039;s art; my favourite clue was 19ac, with its allusion to the infamous &#039;Yo, Blair!&#039; greeting by George Dubya.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8217;12&#8242; appears twice in clue for 17ac, so Uncle Yap&#8217;s explanation must be right.</p>
<p>5dn &#8211; this must be Araucaria&#8217;s mistake, although I worked out the clue assuming the postal district of Buckingham Palace was W1.</p>
<p>17dn &#8211; KERYGMA was a new word to me (I recognise GUERDON from crosswords!) but it was fairly obvious from the wordplay and had an authentic Greek look to it.  Another good example of a relatively easy clue for a relatively difficult word.</p>
<p>Satisfying example of the good Rev&#8217;s art; my favourite clue was 19ac, with its allusion to the infamous &#8216;Yo, Blair!&#8217; greeting by George Dubya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27933</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done, Uncle Yap.   You were saddled with a real stinker for your first Araucaria blog.
I had to resort to quite a bit of research for some of the more unfamiliar answers, among which were: Blondel, kerygma, opus dei and outlier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Uncle Yap.   You were saddled with a real stinker for your first Araucaria blog.<br />
I had to resort to quite a bit of research for some of the more unfamiliar answers, among which were: Blondel, kerygma, opus dei and outlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chunter</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/05/22/guardian-24395-araucaria/#comment-27931</link>
		<dc:creator>Chunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1568#comment-27931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry 19ac, not 9ac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry 19ac, not 9ac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
