Comments on: FT 12,889/Mudd http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/03/ft-12889mudd/ Never knowingly undersolved. Mon, 20 May 2013 13:34:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: smiffy http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/03/ft-12889mudd/#comment-48129 smiffy Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:16:46 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=3076#comment-48129 I had the same reservation about whether “running” necessarily implies “running costs”. Am still a floating voter on that one.

I had not seen the news until your comment prompted me to investigate, Eileen. Spooky indeed!
It must be manna from heaven for the journos at Private Eye – already looking forward to the next edition…

]]> By: Eileen http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/03/ft-12889mudd/#comment-48122 Eileen Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:29:11 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=3076#comment-48122 14dn: may be transparent but did Mudd have prior knowledge of Mandy’s return today?

]]> By: Geoff Moss http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/03/ft-12889mudd/#comment-48117 Geoff Moss Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:15:29 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=3076#comment-48117 May I please have a quibble about the definition in 22d?

‘Upkeep’ is defined as ‘maintenance’ or ‘the cost of maintenance’ which would equate to ‘running repairs’ or ‘running costs’ not simply ‘running’.

]]>