Comments on: Financial Times 12,902 by Mudd http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/30/financial-times-12902-by-mudd/ Never knowingly undersolved. Tue, 21 May 2013 13:00:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Pete Maclean http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/30/financial-times-12902-by-mudd/#comment-52518 Pete Maclean Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:28:07 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=3557#comment-52518 Diagacht, thanks. Seems clear enough now. I occasionally have these blind spots.

Geoff, it did not occur to me at the time but I do agree regarding 20A.

]]> By: Geoff Moss http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/30/financial-times-12902-by-mudd/#comment-52223 Geoff Moss Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:04:49 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=3557#comment-52223 Pete, you were not alone. My notes indicated that this one was harder than usual and I also had a comment ‘confusing’.

I agree with your quibble about 22a and I was also not happy with one of the definitions in 20a, grip does not equate to snatch. ‘Grab a handful of bars’ would have been better in my opinion.

]]> By: diagacht http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/10/30/financial-times-12902-by-mudd/#comment-52219 diagacht Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:32:16 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=3557#comment-52219 11a SINGAPORE (I think you are right): SORE (aggrieved) orbiting IN GAP. I think.

]]>