<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6900 by Dac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/26/independent-6900-by-dac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/26/independent-6900-by-dac/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/26/independent-6900-by-dac/#comment-55728</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=4172#comment-55728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strange how it goes, Niall. Most days you are significantly faster than I am (today your time for The Times was half mine), yet this seemed to me to be one of Dac&#039;s easier crosswords, and I was under 30 minutes.

But it was right up there with the best of his offerings: repeatedly lovely surfaces, and not a single clue was remotely dodgy. What a shame that such a beautifully-crafted thing will soon be forgotten.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange how it goes, Niall. Most days you are significantly faster than I am (today your time for The Times was half mine), yet this seemed to me to be one of Dac&#8217;s easier crosswords, and I was under 30 minutes.</p>
<p>But it was right up there with the best of his offerings: repeatedly lovely surfaces, and not a single clue was remotely dodgy. What a shame that such a beautifully-crafted thing will soon be forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/26/independent-6900-by-dac/#comment-55678</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=4172#comment-55678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you&#039;re right about IRAQ, Testy.   The letters are in correct order (reversed) so &#039;about&#039; is a reversal indicator, not an anagram indicator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right about IRAQ, Testy.   The letters are in correct order (reversed) so &#8216;about&#8217; is a reversal indicator, not an anagram indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/26/independent-6900-by-dac/#comment-55673</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=4172#comment-55673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had trouble parsing 12D so thanks for that.

I read 24A as a reversal of the odd letters rather than an anagram.

I knew 11A would be an anagram but I&#039;m not familiar with the word so struggled with that one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had trouble parsing 12D so thanks for that.</p>
<p>I read 24A as a reversal of the odd letters rather than an anagram.</p>
<p>I knew 11A would be an anagram but I&#8217;m not familiar with the word so struggled with that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
