http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/27/financial-times-12926-by-cinephile/ Never knowingly undersolved. Wed, 22 May 2013 16:06:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/27/financial-times-12926-by-cinephile/#comment-65215 Wil Ransome Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:11:41 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=4148#comment-65215 My guess is that Cinephile is deliberately bypassing conventions. As he tends to do, although this doesn’t seem to stop lots of people worshipping him.

]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/27/financial-times-12926-by-cinephile/#comment-65091 Pete Maclean Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:24:28 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=4148#comment-65091 Actually I do have the original and just dug it out. And I must agree; interpreting “partially” in the way that one normally would does not allow one to extract “mucus”. So, is it Cinephile’s mistake or are we missing something? Or is Cinephile deliberately bypassing conventions?

]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2008/11/27/financial-times-12926-by-cinephile/#comment-65087 Wil Ransome Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:45:30 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=4148#comment-65087 So long ago now, Pete, that you’ve probably not got the original. 6dn (Succumb partially, when climbing, …, with the answer MUCUS) looks to me like a mistake, unless there’s something very devious going on that I don’t understand. I’m surprised nobody commented at the time.

]]>