Posted by smiffy on 16th January 2009
A rapid-fire, skeletal posting for now as I’m won’t have any more free time for the next several hours. At least this leaves the stage clear for others to opine until I can return to flesh things out..
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 7 Comments »
Posted by neildubya on 16th January 2009
Great puzzle. I can’t believe how long it took me to spot what was going on at 1a and 29a. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 4 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 16th January 2009
I’ve very little time for this today, so apologies for any errors – I needed quite a bit of research to get or confirm the song titles, but I don’t mind that. As ever with Paul, there are lots of clues here that made me smile.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 26 Comments »
Posted by Dave Hennings on 16th January 2009
No EV last week, it got bumped by a £500 Cryptic (I bet that had a few entries). However, the number still got used, so it’s onwards to 844 this week.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Enigmatic Variations | No Comments »
Posted by duncanshiell on 16th January 2009
There was a very short preamble on this puzzle – ‘each Across clue contains an extraneous definition of one of the Down Clues, which are otherwise unclued’.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Inquisitor | 4 Comments »
Posted by Simon Harris on 16th January 2009
*=anag, []=dropped, <=reversed, hom=homophone, cd=cryptic definition, dd=double definition.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 24 Comments »