<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6949 by Phi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/01/23/independent-6949-by-phi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/01/23/independent-6949-by-phi/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/01/23/independent-6949-by-phi/#comment-65051</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5172#comment-65051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Niall - this was difficult for a Phi puzzle.  But some good misdirections; in 24a I spent ages trying to think if there was a name for an alphabetical sequence of three letters, beginning with &#039;th&#039; (two-thirds of &#039;the&#039;) followed by a synonym or example of &#039;time&#039;.  And as a chemist I have to confess to not getting &#039;hydrogen&#039; for ages, although I got &#039;molybdenum&#039; straightaway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Niall &#8211; this was difficult for a Phi puzzle.  But some good misdirections; in 24a I spent ages trying to think if there was a name for an alphabetical sequence of three letters, beginning with &#8216;th&#8217; (two-thirds of &#8216;the&#8217;) followed by a synonym or example of &#8216;time&#8217;.  And as a chemist I have to confess to not getting &#8216;hydrogen&#8217; for ages, although I got &#8216;molybdenum&#8217; straightaway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/01/23/independent-6949-by-phi/#comment-65027</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5172#comment-65027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a maths person from way back, Wil, the points you make re KLM did occur to me and you are of course right but I notice over the years that the bookies give the odds 66/1, never 67/1.   Agree with you re 2 dn also which was the last I understood and was a little surprised at the usage in a daily puzzle and wondered was there maybe another explanation.   I did enjoy the puzzle tho and Phi clues always tend to stack up - I find I almost always understand them fully in the end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a maths person from way back, Wil, the points you make re KLM did occur to me and you are of course right but I notice over the years that the bookies give the odds 66/1, never 67/1.   Agree with you re 2 dn also which was the last I understood and was a little surprised at the usage in a daily puzzle and wondered was there maybe another explanation.   I did enjoy the puzzle tho and Phi clues always tend to stack up &#8211; I find I almost always understand them fully in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/01/23/independent-6949-by-phi/#comment-65006</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5172#comment-65006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you must have been off form, Niall. This struck me as of average Pie difficulty, i.e. not very hard.
Two minor grumbles: I didn&#039;t like the 66% in 24ac and would have preferred two-thirds, which doesn&#039;t give it away any more than the rather obvious 66%, which isn&#039;t even accurate, since it should be 66 2/3%. If he must give a whole number, it&#039;s closer to 67%.
And I thought that had = &#039;d in 2dn was not quite everyday cryptic fare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you must have been off form, Niall. This struck me as of average Pie difficulty, i.e. not very hard.<br />
Two minor grumbles: I didn&#8217;t like the 66% in 24ac and would have preferred two-thirds, which doesn&#8217;t give it away any more than the rather obvious 66%, which isn&#8217;t even accurate, since it should be 66 2/3%. If he must give a whole number, it&#8217;s closer to 67%.<br />
And I thought that had = &#8216;d in 2dn was not quite everyday cryptic fare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
