Comments on: FT 12,994/Viking http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/06/ft-12994viking/ Never knowingly undersolved. Sun, 26 May 2013 05:54:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: smiffy http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/06/ft-12994viking/#comment-67110 smiffy Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:08:36 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5482#comment-67110 You’re right about NAP – my skew-whiff parsing was a result of my smart-arse attempts to solve without a pen. I know it’s a term used by newspaper tipsters for their “sure fire” bet of the day, so I think that qualifies it as a (racing) certainty.

HIT-AND-RUN was my runner up in clue of day.

]]> By: nmsindy http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/06/ft-12994viking/#comment-67073 nmsindy Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:43:48 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5482#comment-67073 I enjoyed this, a little easier than usual from Viking, I thought. Favourites, HIT-AND-RUN and DECIPHER. Top half easier than bottom half. Did wonder about ‘nap’ as ‘certainty’ but looked in dicts after and they confirm it. I think it’s NAP not SNAP with the S coming from “number one’s”

]]> By: C.G. Rishikesh http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/06/ft-12994viking/#comment-67044 C.G. Rishikesh Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:35:49 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5482#comment-67044 In India we speak of GoI orders, where g is for Government.

]]>