Comments on: Financial Times 13,000 / Satori http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/financial-times-13000-satori/ Never knowingly undersolved. Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:51:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: C.G. Rishikesh http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/financial-times-13000-satori/#comment-68647 C.G. Rishikesh Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:11:39 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5610#comment-68647 ACP,

I don’t know what Gaufrid thinks, but your justification appears to me to be acceptable – it’s so simple without one having to look at the clue number and without having to do any calculation.

]]> By: ACP http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/financial-times-13000-satori/#comment-68636 ACP Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:33:07 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5610#comment-68636 Yep, didn’t know what 30ac was all about.
My reasoning was ‘over’ meant ‘reverse’, ‘two’ 2, ‘and a half’ (of two) 1. So 2,1 reversed is 12.

Never seen this device before.

]]>