<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6967 by Tyrus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Biddlecombe</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-72302</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Biddlecombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-72302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably too late for anyone to see ...

Did this as part of a catch-up on recent Indie puzzles I&#039;ve not had time to solve.  Extremely hard, partly because I missed the footieness and expected the two long anags to be BUSHISMS.  Eventually saw ENOUGH as a possible last word of the longer, but then guessed &quot;think you&#039;re good enough&quot; as the ending, which made things worse for a while.  In the end, found them both but gave up a couple of other answers short.

Maybe the trick with these is not to use them from new setters until they&#039;ve had a couple of plainer puzzles, and people have had the chance to get used to their style.  Or get them to use charade or other &quot;construction kit&quot; wordplay some of the time - this might give you a better chance of confirming part of the answer than reducing a 40-letter anagram to say 20 possible letters.

But on football as opposed to other sporting stuff, why on earth not?  I&#039;m always pleased to see material that doesn&#039;t come from the usual cricket, golf and a bit each of tennis &amp; rugger.  Football, snooker, darts - bring &#039;em on.  As they do even in the &quot;posh people&#039;s&quot; Times puzzle these days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably too late for anyone to see &#8230;</p>
<p>Did this as part of a catch-up on recent Indie puzzles I&#8217;ve not had time to solve.  Extremely hard, partly because I missed the footieness and expected the two long anags to be BUSHISMS.  Eventually saw ENOUGH as a possible last word of the longer, but then guessed &#8220;think you&#8217;re good enough&#8221; as the ending, which made things worse for a while.  In the end, found them both but gave up a couple of other answers short.</p>
<p>Maybe the trick with these is not to use them from new setters until they&#8217;ve had a couple of plainer puzzles, and people have had the chance to get used to their style.  Or get them to use charade or other &#8220;construction kit&#8221; wordplay some of the time &#8211; this might give you a better chance of confirming part of the answer than reducing a 40-letter anagram to say 20 possible letters.</p>
<p>But on football as opposed to other sporting stuff, why on earth not?  I&#8217;m always pleased to see material that doesn&#8217;t come from the usual cricket, golf and a bit each of tennis &amp; rugger.  Football, snooker, darts &#8211; bring &#8216;em on.  As they do even in the &#8220;posh people&#8217;s&#8221; Times puzzle these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyro</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68960</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, because they are fish, and if you look them up in any dictionary it says they are. And I don&#039;t think you&#039;ve apologised for calling Tyrus a repellent thug yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, because they are fish, and if you look them up in any dictionary it says they are. And I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ve apologised for calling Tyrus a repellent thug yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Streatfield</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68589</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Streatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Chambers (2006), a SONATA is a musical composition. And also according to Chambers, a SCORE is also a musical composition of a particular kind, i.e. written down. By the time they had sonatas they were generally written down. So a SONATA is a kind of score, in the same way that a SYMPHONY is a kind of score. You wouldn&#039;t object to the definition of COD, BASS, CARP, EEL etc. as being FISH, would you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Chambers (2006), a SONATA is a musical composition. And also according to Chambers, a SCORE is also a musical composition of a particular kind, i.e. written down. By the time they had sonatas they were generally written down. So a SONATA is a kind of score, in the same way that a SYMPHONY is a kind of score. You wouldn&#8217;t object to the definition of COD, BASS, CARP, EEL etc. as being FISH, would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68580</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I managed to complete this, I did find it very hard.  I think the problem was that there were two long anagram clues (for not very well-known expressions)which spread themselves over most of the puzzle.  Like Eimi, I&#039;m not a fan of the extra-long anagram - I find them almost impossible to solve from the given letters, and have to hope for inspiration while staring at the skeletonised expression once I&#039;ve got a few letters.  Although I&#039;m a fan of Araucaria, who appears to delight in these, I do find them more than a bit of a pain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I managed to complete this, I did find it very hard.  I think the problem was that there were two long anagram clues (for not very well-known expressions)which spread themselves over most of the puzzle.  Like Eimi, I&#8217;m not a fan of the extra-long anagram &#8211; I find them almost impossible to solve from the given letters, and have to hope for inspiration while staring at the skeletonised expression once I&#8217;ve got a few letters.  Although I&#8217;m a fan of Araucaria, who appears to delight in these, I do find them more than a bit of a pain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68573</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Score&#039; is the printed form of the music rather than the thing itself, shurely?

As a rock drummer, I may well be wrong ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Score&#8217; is the printed form of the music rather than the thing itself, shurely?</p>
<p>As a rock drummer, I may well be wrong &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Streatfield</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68484</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Streatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re. Tyro&#039;s comment (number 7)

Did I say that we can&#039;t have clues about football?

One of my favourite clues, out of the ones I have compiled, is:

&quot;Out-of-form Aston Villa finally score&quot;

Answer: SONATA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. Tyro&#8217;s comment (number 7)</p>
<p>Did I say that we can&#8217;t have clues about football?</p>
<p>One of my favourite clues, out of the ones I have compiled, is:</p>
<p>&#8220;Out-of-form Aston Villa finally score&#8221;</p>
<p>Answer: SONATA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eimi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68380</link>
		<dc:creator>eimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point on the Saturday slot, Simon - I like to put the other &#039;tough&#039; guys there. Unfortunately the layout means that the Saturday crossword (in columns) needs to be quite well-balanced in terms of clue lengths, whereas in the daily puzzle the acrosses and downs run on. This crossword would only fit on the daily template, but at least many people will have a couple of days off to recover now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point on the Saturday slot, Simon &#8211; I like to put the other &#8216;tough&#8217; guys there. Unfortunately the layout means that the Saturday crossword (in columns) needs to be quite well-balanced in terms of clue lengths, whereas in the daily puzzle the acrosses and downs run on. This crossword would only fit on the daily template, but at least many people will have a couple of days off to recover now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68376</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost totally defeated by this one.  Got 30/3 as it&#039;s not confined to football circles, but 10 etc totally passed me by.  Puzzled for a while on 24d as it was obviously &#039;yarra&#039; but thinking of &#039;arr&#039; (abbreviation used in music) for &#039;arrangement&#039; and trying to think how &#039;ay&#039; could equate to &#039;go&#039;.  Just shows how one can miss the obvious!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost totally defeated by this one.  Got 30/3 as it&#8217;s not confined to football circles, but 10 etc totally passed me by.  Puzzled for a while on 24d as it was obviously &#8216;yarra&#8217; but thinking of &#8216;arr&#8217; (abbreviation used in music) for &#8216;arrangement&#8217; and trying to think how &#8216;ay&#8217; could equate to &#8216;go&#8217;.  Just shows how one can miss the obvious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68328</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a really interesting one. For my part, I spent all morning languishing on 3 clues solved (this did have to compete with work for my attention, though), and eventually had to draft in Ciaran from the Guardian solving team to make any further progress.

But that said, everything seemed fair and it was all enjoyable...so no complaints, but perhaps this was more suited to a Saturday?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a really interesting one. For my part, I spent all morning languishing on 3 clues solved (this did have to compete with work for my attention, though), and eventually had to draft in Ciaran from the Guardian solving team to make any further progress.</p>
<p>But that said, everything seemed fair and it was all enjoyable&#8230;so no complaints, but perhaps this was more suited to a Saturday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyrus</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/13/independent-6967-by-tyrus/#comment-68315</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5604#comment-68315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for the blog and to all who took the trouble to comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the blog and to all who took the trouble to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
