<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24,628 / Pasquale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69856</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belated thanks -- I&#039;ve been away]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belated thanks &#8212; I&#8217;ve been away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Page</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69685</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TACHE is in SOED with several meanings but &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; the meaning of &quot;moustache&quot; (which surprised me). TASH and TAZ are both given as shorter forms of &quot;moustache&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TACHE is in SOED with several meanings but <b>not</b> the meaning of &#8220;moustache&#8221; (which surprised me). TASH and TAZ are both given as shorter forms of &#8220;moustache&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69682</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rattled through this last night and wrote shopping list simultaneously. Have now purchased far too much mayonnaise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rattled through this last night and wrote shopping list simultaneously. Have now purchased far too much mayonnaise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smutchin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69641</link>
		<dc:creator>smutchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wil - I had similar doubts but came to the same conclusion as Eileen, ie that &quot;baring&quot; was leading you to the definition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wil &#8211; I had similar doubts but came to the same conclusion as Eileen, ie that &#8220;baring&#8221; was leading you to the definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69639</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wil: yes, I can see that it&#039;s rather ambiguous but you start with &#039;matters of principle&#039; and then teeth comes at the end, where you&#039;d expect to find the definition [or at the beginning!] and baring means &#039;revealing&#039;. [I&#039;ve [just] &#039;cheated&#039; and MOLARS is the solution given.]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wil: yes, I can see that it&#8217;s rather ambiguous but you start with &#8216;matters of principle&#8217; and then teeth comes at the end, where you&#8217;d expect to find the definition [or at the beginning!] and baring means &#8216;revealing&#8217;. [I've [just] &#8216;cheated&#8217; and MOLARS is the solution given.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69637</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I only did this because I was in Sainsbury&#039;s and had to buy something to use their cashback facility. What a good thing that was — this was really good and 12dn was memorable.

The only slight doubt I had was with 1ac: is it quite clearly MOLARS? Not MORALS? It&#039;s not totally clear to me which part &quot;One changes sides&quot; refers to. Neither reading seems quite satisfactory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I only did this because I was in Sainsbury&#8217;s and had to buy something to use their cashback facility. What a good thing that was — this was really good and 12dn was memorable.</p>
<p>The only slight doubt I had was with 1ac: is it quite clearly MOLARS? Not MORALS? It&#8217;s not totally clear to me which part &#8220;One changes sides&#8221; refers to. Neither reading seems quite satisfactory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stiofain_x</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69623</link>
		<dc:creator>stiofain_x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great puzzle and nice to see The Don back and on top form.
As I have said before I dislike the hidden answer form of clue but MAYONNAISE is an absolute classic.
Too many good clues and surface readings to list but I loved 14ac in particular and the slang ref in 2 down.
All the obscurities were fairly clued and although i wasnt confident filling in TASH the explanation from Eileen satisfied me totally.
Great one, thanks Don.
Stiofain]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great puzzle and nice to see The Don back and on top form.<br />
As I have said before I dislike the hidden answer form of clue but MAYONNAISE is an absolute classic.<br />
Too many good clues and surface readings to list but I loved 14ac in particular and the slang ref in 2 down.<br />
All the obscurities were fairly clued and although i wasnt confident filling in TASH the explanation from Eileen satisfied me totally.<br />
Great one, thanks Don.<br />
Stiofain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smutchin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69613</link>
		<dc:creator>smutchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim, I think you were right first time - tache is the short form of moustache. But if it&#039;s in the big red book... sigh! 

In any case, can&#039;t argue with the fairness of this or any of the other clues today - this is a totally by-the-book crossword, and a fine example of How To Do It Right. Unfortunately, that being the case, there&#039;s perhaps slightly too much reliance on hackneyed devices (21d being the most horrible example) - but then Pasquale goes and pulls the utterly brilliant 12d out of the bag! Genius!

I rather liked 11a as well - lovely &amp;lit, as already mentioned. And the use of &quot;changing sides&quot; in 1a was very neat.

Word count bores might like to note that today&#039;s puzzle weighs in at an epic 8.6. Was he being paid by the word? It&#039;s positively Dickensian!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I think you were right first time &#8211; tache is the short form of moustache. But if it&#8217;s in the big red book&#8230; sigh! </p>
<p>In any case, can&#8217;t argue with the fairness of this or any of the other clues today &#8211; this is a totally by-the-book crossword, and a fine example of How To Do It Right. Unfortunately, that being the case, there&#8217;s perhaps slightly too much reliance on hackneyed devices (21d being the most horrible example) &#8211; but then Pasquale goes and pulls the utterly brilliant 12d out of the bag! Genius!</p>
<p>I rather liked 11a as well &#8211; lovely &amp;lit, as already mentioned. And the use of &#8220;changing sides&#8221; in 1a was very neat.</p>
<p>Word count bores might like to note that today&#8217;s puzzle weighs in at an epic 8.6. Was he being paid by the word? It&#8217;s positively Dickensian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69612</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speckled Jim: it&#039;s not really like that: I rarely &#039;rattle through&#039; a puzzle just like that, and when I say, &#039;The word play&#039;s absolutely clear&#039;, that, too, is usually with the benefit of hindsight and a feeling of &#039;Why couldn&#039;t I have seen that ages ago?&#039; Personally, I don&#039;t really appreciate a puzzle unless I&#039;ve had to wrestle with it. We bloggers are really only solvers who have stuck our necks out, you know!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speckled Jim: it&#8217;s not really like that: I rarely &#8216;rattle through&#8217; a puzzle just like that, and when I say, &#8216;The word play&#8217;s absolutely clear&#8217;, that, too, is usually with the benefit of hindsight and a feeling of &#8216;Why couldn&#8217;t I have seen that ages ago?&#8217; Personally, I don&#8217;t really appreciate a puzzle unless I&#8217;ve had to wrestle with it. We bloggers are really only solvers who have stuck our necks out, you know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/20/guardian-24628-pasquale/#comment-69605</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5772#comment-69605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Speckled Jim
Both tash and tache are in the 11th Ed. of the Concise OED, the latter being defined as a variant of the former. Just to complete the list, Collins (5th Ed., I don&#039;t have access to a later one) only has tache.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Speckled Jim<br />
Both tash and tache are in the 11th Ed. of the Concise OED, the latter being defined as a variant of the former. Just to complete the list, Collins (5th Ed., I don&#8217;t have access to a later one) only has tache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
