<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24,623/Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69788</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unusually, I got the theme almost immediately - seeing FAMOUS easily and getting BELGIAN straight after.  However, it was still quite a slog to get though the rest of the puzzle, though very pleasurable!  I found this much more difficult than his previous outings in the Guardian - the word play in the clues was tight and not very transparent.  That&#039;s an observation, not a criticism - I may just not have been at the top of my form...

(By comparison, I raced through this Saturday&#039;s Araucaria faster than the average Rufus!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unusually, I got the theme almost immediately &#8211; seeing FAMOUS easily and getting BELGIAN straight after.  However, it was still quite a slog to get though the rest of the puzzle, though very pleasurable!  I found this much more difficult than his previous outings in the Guardian &#8211; the word play in the clues was tight and not very transparent.  That&#8217;s an observation, not a criticism &#8211; I may just not have been at the top of my form&#8230;</p>
<p>(By comparison, I raced through this Saturday&#8217;s Araucaria faster than the average Rufus!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69716</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eileen, I suppose I read &quot;every third character&quot; as &quot;one character in three&quot;, not caring about where the sequence starts, so it could be LGI, AET or RCY, but I can see that under a strict interpretation only the last of these 
I suppose the problem is that there&#039;s no equivalent expression to &quot;every other&quot; when you&#039;re picking one in three instead of one in two without actually mentioning the number three in some way. 

Of course, to be ultra-pedantic there&#039;s only &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt; &quot;third character&quot;, namely R, and the next one is the sixth...  

(This all reminds me of Alice&#039;s discussion with the Red Queen about having jam &quot;every other day&quot;.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen, I suppose I read &#8220;every third character&#8221; as &#8220;one character in three&#8221;, not caring about where the sequence starts, so it could be LGI, AET or RCY, but I can see that under a strict interpretation only the last of these<br />
I suppose the problem is that there&#8217;s no equivalent expression to &#8220;every other&#8221; when you&#8217;re picking one in three instead of one in two without actually mentioning the number three in some way. </p>
<p>Of course, to be ultra-pedantic there&#8217;s only <i>one</i> &#8220;third character&#8221;, namely R, and the next one is the sixth&#8230;  </p>
<p>(This all reminds me of Alice&#8217;s discussion with the Red Queen about having jam &#8220;every other day&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69714</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Andrew, and, also, thanks for the blog, which I omitted earlier, but how can LGI be &#039;every third character&#039;, when it begins with L? The only way to make it work, as I said before, is to include the &#039;in&#039;, which your explanatory example does not do. Am I being extraordinarily dim? [This is only a little niggle ;-) ]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andrew, and, also, thanks for the blog, which I omitted earlier, but how can LGI be &#8216;every third character&#8217;, when it begins with L? The only way to make it work, as I said before, is to include the &#8216;in&#8217;, which your explanatory example does not do. Am I being extraordinarily dim? [This is only a little niggle <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69710</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eileen - I see what you mean, but I think &quot;every third character in large city&quot; is fine for LGI, just as &quot;every other character in large city&quot; could (less helpfully) give LREIY.  

Richard - I also found the famous Belgians site you mention, though I suspect some of the 259 are not even all that famous in Belgium itself..

(Another famous, though fictional, Belgian that no one has mentioned so far is Hercule Poirot. )
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen &#8211; I see what you mean, but I think &#8220;every third character in large city&#8221; is fine for LGI, just as &#8220;every other character in large city&#8221; could (less helpfully) give LREIY.  </p>
<p>Richard &#8211; I also found the famous Belgians site you mention, though I suspect some of the 259 are not even all that famous in Belgium itself..</p>
<p>(Another famous, though fictional, Belgian that no one has mentioned so far is Hercule Poirot. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69704</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry: I meant the *surface* was excellent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry: I meant the *surface* was excellent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69702</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this puzzle totally absorbing. I was completely led up the garden here, by getting Van Dyck and Magritte first and so, like Smutchin, being led to believe we were looking for artists [especially after getting Rubens, although that came later, to add to the confusion]. I was further misled by the fact that the theme answers were, unusually, separated and, in 17ac, LGI are not &#039;every third character&#039;, are they? - unless we start from &#039;in&#039; and then it works? It took me a long time to be confident enough to put in the answer and then it all began to fall into place.

8ac: the golden arches of McDonalds - no problem

9ac: &#039;homophone&#039;?: again, my late Scottish husband and my present choirmaster [and, I have to say, I] would disagree!

I hope this is not going &#039;off-comment&#039; but my explanation for 15ac was: &#039;Me? No!&#039; inside SIN: typical me, not seeing the wood for the trees - a simple reversal!

20ac: for me, the last to go in and the ultimate jaw-dropping moment. Others might argue about this [mis]use of the theme but I thought it was brilliant. I&#039;d been wondering all along about the absence of Tintin.

19dn: I&#039;d never heard of this bird but the wordplay was impeccable and the wordplay excellent

Brilliant puzzle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this puzzle totally absorbing. I was completely led up the garden here, by getting Van Dyck and Magritte first and so, like Smutchin, being led to believe we were looking for artists [especially after getting Rubens, although that came later, to add to the confusion]. I was further misled by the fact that the theme answers were, unusually, separated and, in 17ac, LGI are not &#8216;every third character&#8217;, are they? &#8211; unless we start from &#8216;in&#8217; and then it works? It took me a long time to be confident enough to put in the answer and then it all began to fall into place.</p>
<p>8ac: the golden arches of McDonalds &#8211; no problem</p>
<p>9ac: &#8216;homophone&#8217;?: again, my late Scottish husband and my present choirmaster [and, I have to say, I] would disagree!</p>
<p>I hope this is not going &#8216;off-comment&#8217; but my explanation for 15ac was: &#8216;Me? No!&#8217; inside SIN: typical me, not seeing the wood for the trees &#8211; a simple reversal!</p>
<p>20ac: for me, the last to go in and the ultimate jaw-dropping moment. Others might argue about this [mis]use of the theme but I thought it was brilliant. I&#8217;d been wondering all along about the absence of Tintin.</p>
<p>19dn: I&#8217;d never heard of this bird but the wordplay was impeccable and the wordplay excellent</p>
<p>Brilliant puzzle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhl</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69698</link>
		<dc:creator>mhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was wonderfully rich puzzle, I thought - very enjoyable.  Thanks for the post, Andrew - particularly for the example Brindisi from La Traviata.  There&#039;s a very minor typo in 13d, missing the &quot;I +&quot; before ARIES.

I really liked the M for McDonalds, from the instantly recognizable &quot;golden arches&quot; logo.  It&#039;s nice to see some new bits of crossword code being introduced.

There&#039;s a nice page on suggestions for the &quot;famous belgians&quot; dinner party game &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A1038692&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was wonderfully rich puzzle, I thought &#8211; very enjoyable.  Thanks for the post, Andrew &#8211; particularly for the example Brindisi from La Traviata.  There&#8217;s a very minor typo in 13d, missing the &#8220;I +&#8221; before ARIES.</p>
<p>I really liked the M for McDonalds, from the instantly recognizable &#8220;golden arches&#8221; logo.  It&#8217;s nice to see some new bits of crossword code being introduced.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a nice page on suggestions for the &#8220;famous belgians&#8221; dinner party game <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A1038692" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heald</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69697</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good fun solve, helped enormously by my discovery of the website www.famousbelgians.net, which lists no fewer than 259 such!  Even so, I was tripped up by HERITAGE, despite thinking early on that Herge &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; feature somewhere.  Shame there was no room for Jean-Claude Van Damme though ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good fun solve, helped enormously by my discovery of the website <a href="http://www.famousbelgians.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.famousbelgians.net</a>, which lists no fewer than 259 such!  Even so, I was tripped up by HERITAGE, despite thinking early on that Herge <i>must</i> feature somewhere.  Shame there was no room for Jean-Claude Van Damme though &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69695</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I conjecture that Paul has been reading &quot;Love etc.&quot; by one of my favorite authors, Julian Barnes, where there is a conversation about a dinner-party challenge to name six famous Belgians (apart from Simenon). Says Oliver: &quot;Six, apart from Simenon? Easy-peasy. Magritte, Cesar Franck, Maeterlinck, Jacques Brel, Delvaux and Herge, creator of Tintin. Plus fifty percent of Johnny Hallyday, I add as a pourboire&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I conjecture that Paul has been reading &#8220;Love etc.&#8221; by one of my favorite authors, Julian Barnes, where there is a conversation about a dinner-party challenge to name six famous Belgians (apart from Simenon). Says Oliver: &#8220;Six, apart from Simenon? Easy-peasy. Magritte, Cesar Franck, Maeterlinck, Jacques Brel, Delvaux and Herge, creator of Tintin. Plus fifty percent of Johnny Hallyday, I add as a pourboire&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smutchin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/21/guardian-24623paul/#comment-69693</link>
		<dc:creator>smutchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5801#comment-69693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was an outstanding effort from Paul - not one of his most difficult but brilliantly witty and lots of fun, not to mention extraordinarily economical with words.

I got 4d and 5d before I&#039;d worked out the theme, and was looking for names of artists for a while until it clicked. It&#039;s been said before that knowing the theme can make the rest of the puzzle too easy, but I didn&#039;t think that was the case here - especially the very clever 20a (Eileen, if you&#039;re reading, to answer your question last week: I got there in the end!) 

On the other hand, all the names are well-enough-known (to the average Guardian reader, I&#039;d argue) for reference sources not to be necessary - in fact, the only answers I had to check were non-themed ones: 1d BRINDISI (not familiar with the drinking song), 19d SERIEMA (got it from the wordplay but it&#039;s a new word for me).

The only disappointment for me is that my personal favourite Belgians didn&#039;t get a mention - Eddy Merckx, Jacques Brel and Audrey Hepburn. But I&#039;m also a big fan of the Maigret and Tintin books, so glad Simenon and Herge got a mention.

Thanks for the blog, Andrew - couple of queries resolved. I&#039;m still not sure about 8a - M=McDonald&#039;s is perhaps a liberty too far. And I put FEMURS for 22d without understanding the wordplay... You&#039;re right that sign=ARIES does seem to have cropped up a fair bit recently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was an outstanding effort from Paul &#8211; not one of his most difficult but brilliantly witty and lots of fun, not to mention extraordinarily economical with words.</p>
<p>I got 4d and 5d before I&#8217;d worked out the theme, and was looking for names of artists for a while until it clicked. It&#8217;s been said before that knowing the theme can make the rest of the puzzle too easy, but I didn&#8217;t think that was the case here &#8211; especially the very clever 20a (Eileen, if you&#8217;re reading, to answer your question last week: I got there in the end!) </p>
<p>On the other hand, all the names are well-enough-known (to the average Guardian reader, I&#8217;d argue) for reference sources not to be necessary &#8211; in fact, the only answers I had to check were non-themed ones: 1d BRINDISI (not familiar with the drinking song), 19d SERIEMA (got it from the wordplay but it&#8217;s a new word for me).</p>
<p>The only disappointment for me is that my personal favourite Belgians didn&#8217;t get a mention &#8211; Eddy Merckx, Jacques Brel and Audrey Hepburn. But I&#8217;m also a big fan of the Maigret and Tintin books, so glad Simenon and Herge got a mention.</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog, Andrew &#8211; couple of queries resolved. I&#8217;m still not sure about 8a &#8211; M=McDonald&#8217;s is perhaps a liberty too far. And I put FEMURS for 22d without understanding the wordplay&#8230; You&#8217;re right that sign=ARIES does seem to have cropped up a fair bit recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
