<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24630 &#8211; Rufus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Page</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-70138</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-70138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard - at one point I was thinking along similar lines but chief executive (officer) is nearly always CEO rather than just CE...and how would we explain the word &quot;Italian&quot; in the clue?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; at one point I was thinking along similar lines but chief executive (officer) is nearly always CEO rather than just CE&#8230;and how would we explain the word &#8220;Italian&#8221; in the clue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69996</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1dn - De + Du + CE (Chief Executive)? That&#039;s how I read it anyway. Enjoyed this one a lot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1dn &#8211; De + Du + CE (Chief Executive)? That&#8217;s how I read it anyway. Enjoyed this one a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69900</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strangely 23 and 19 were my last two. OK, it proves I&#039;m wierd, but y&#039;all knew that! Failing to remember what Suede is made from really didn&#039;t help, sigh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely 23 and 19 were my last two. OK, it proves I&#8217;m wierd, but y&#8217;all knew that! Failing to remember what Suede is made from really didn&#8217;t help, sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69892</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[13a NIHILISTS: Chambers 2008 gives &#039;extreme scepticism&#039; under &#039;nihilism&#039;. So this clue isn&#039;t even cyptic: but I liked it because I had thought of NOVELISTS as a possible answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13a NIHILISTS: Chambers 2008 gives &#8216;extreme scepticism&#8217; under &#8216;nihilism&#8217;. So this clue isn&#8217;t even cyptic: but I liked it because I had thought of NOVELISTS as a possible answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69891</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only vague cryptic implication I could see in 13a was that it had the polar extremes  at its own extremities - I&#039;m sure that&#039;s probably coincidence though.  Drerw a blank on 23a even with the crosses in - hope its just one of those blind spots, not the beginning of the end for the brain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only vague cryptic implication I could see in 13a was that it had the polar extremes  at its own extremities &#8211; I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s probably coincidence though.  Drerw a blank on 23a even with the crosses in &#8211; hope its just one of those blind spots, not the beginning of the end for the brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69888</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment on 1dn - DUCE was never one of the usual Italian words for &#039;leader&#039;, which would be &#039;capo&#039; or &#039;direttore&#039;.  It was a historical term for a commander in the (ancient) Roman army, until Mussolini adopted it.  Therefore it is different from &#039;Fuehrer&#039; in German - a previously unremarkable word for &#039;leader&#039; which has become so tainted by association that Germans now always use &#039;Leiter&#039; instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment on 1dn &#8211; DUCE was never one of the usual Italian words for &#8216;leader&#8217;, which would be &#8216;capo&#8217; or &#8216;direttore&#8217;.  It was a historical term for a commander in the (ancient) Roman army, until Mussolini adopted it.  Therefore it is different from &#8216;Fuehrer&#8217; in German &#8211; a previously unremarkable word for &#8216;leader&#8217; which has become so tainted by association that Germans now always use &#8216;Leiter&#8217; instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69887</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good puzzle from Rufus, as usual.
13ac NIHILISTS and 11dn WHEELBARROWS were my last solves, but I like them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good puzzle from Rufus, as usual.<br />
13ac NIHILISTS and 11dn WHEELBARROWS were my last solves, but I like them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69885</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straightforward but elegant as ever.  Fewer than usual cd and dd clues, which I liked.  13ac didn&#039;t seem cryptic at all to me, which was a pity, but more than compensated for by the lovely 18ac]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straightforward but elegant as ever.  Fewer than usual cd and dd clues, which I liked.  13ac didn&#8217;t seem cryptic at all to me, which was a pity, but more than compensated for by the lovely 18ac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manehi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69884</link>
		<dc:creator>manehi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smutchin - you give me too much credit ;) I missed the palindrome completely..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smutchin &#8211; you give me too much credit <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I missed the palindrome completely..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/23/guardian-24630-rufus/#comment-69883</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5852#comment-69883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought 6dn was a good cryptic definition, and since when I look up nihilist it says &#039;extreme sceptic&#039; or something close, I can&#039;t see any crypticism at all in 13ac.  But I liked the puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 6dn was a good cryptic definition, and since when I look up nihilist it says &#8216;extreme sceptic&#8217; or something close, I can&#8217;t see any crypticism at all in 13ac.  But I liked the puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
