<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,012 / Sleuth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/#comment-71106</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5982#comment-71106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for that Agentzero. As I never watch (if I can possibly avoid it), and have never played, football you explained it far more clearly than I would have been able to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for that Agentzero. As I never watch (if I can possibly avoid it), and have never played, football you explained it far more clearly than I would have been able to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agentzero</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/#comment-71105</link>
		<dc:creator>agentzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5982#comment-71105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello again Gaufrid and Eileen.  FT solvers are a small select company it seems!

I think it&#039;s not unusual for football commentators to refer to the midfielder as being the heart of a team.  Playing in the center of the field, distributing the ball to others, etc.  So on that basis I thought it worked and was quite clever.

Here&#039;s a sample from a Google search (footballtalentspotters.com):  &quot;The heart of any football team, central midfield is probably the most physically-demanding, intelligence-requiring role on the field, requiring both the greatest variation of attributes and the fiercest ball-winning drive.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again Gaufrid and Eileen.  FT solvers are a small select company it seems!</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s not unusual for football commentators to refer to the midfielder as being the heart of a team.  Playing in the center of the field, distributing the ball to others, etc.  So on that basis I thought it worked and was quite clever.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a sample from a Google search (footballtalentspotters.com):  &#8220;The heart of any football team, central midfield is probably the most physically-demanding, intelligence-requiring role on the field, requiring both the greatest variation of attributes and the fiercest ball-winning drive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/#comment-71091</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5982#comment-71091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Gaufrid - you&#039;re quite right: it was your not putting in &#039;other&#039; that confused me. I didn&#039;t read it properly.

But, sorry, &#039;heart of a pitch&#039; just doesn&#039;t work for me - but then I&#039;m no football fan [not that shaped ball, anyway]. It just seems to me there must be a much better clue for &#039;heart of hearts&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Gaufrid &#8211; you&#8217;re quite right: it was your not putting in &#8216;other&#8217; that confused me. I didn&#8217;t read it properly.</p>
<p>But, sorry, &#8216;heart of a pitch&#8217; just doesn&#8217;t work for me &#8211; but then I&#8217;m no football fan [not that shaped ball, anyway]. It just seems to me there must be a much better clue for &#8216;heart of hearts&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/#comment-71087</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5982#comment-71087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen
13a does use the full &#039;OR&#039; so I&#039;m sorry but I don&#039;t understand your comment.

5d Well, a &#039;midfielder&#039; does mainly play in the middle, or &#039;heart&#039;, of the pitch so I thought this was OK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen<br />
13a does use the full &#8216;OR&#8217; so I&#8217;m sorry but I don&#8217;t understand your comment.</p>
<p>5d Well, a &#8216;midfielder&#8217; does mainly play in the middle, or &#8216;heart&#8217;, of the pitch so I thought this was OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/02/27/financial-times-13012-sleuth/#comment-71083</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=5982#comment-71083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Gaufrid

Thanks for the blog, especially the explanation of EMBARGO: I just didn&#039;t associate &#039;ego&#039; with &#039;one&#039;.

Apart from that and taking far too long to get 11ac, there was no great challenge here, though I did think some of the clues were rather odd. I agree with your doubts about &#039;obscured by&#039; in 15ac: &#039;confused with&#039; would have served better - and surely candelabra are more than &#039;a set of ornaments&#039;?

13ac: OR for &#039;other ranks&#039; is commonplace - but R by itself?

9dn: &#039;heart&#039; = &#039;midfielder&#039;?

I&#039;ve come across Lorca [and orc!] several times in crosswords - and I don&#039;t think zabaglione is particularly exotic!

I did like 22 and 26ac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gaufrid</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog, especially the explanation of EMBARGO: I just didn&#8217;t associate &#8216;ego&#8217; with &#8216;one&#8217;.</p>
<p>Apart from that and taking far too long to get 11ac, there was no great challenge here, though I did think some of the clues were rather odd. I agree with your doubts about &#8216;obscured by&#8217; in 15ac: &#8216;confused with&#8217; would have served better &#8211; and surely candelabra are more than &#8216;a set of ornaments&#8217;?</p>
<p>13ac: OR for &#8216;other ranks&#8217; is commonplace &#8211; but R by itself?</p>
<p>9dn: &#8216;heart&#8217; = &#8216;midfielder&#8217;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve come across Lorca [and orc!] several times in crosswords &#8211; and I don&#8217;t think zabaglione is particularly exotic!</p>
<p>I did like 22 and 26ac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
