Financial Times 13,064 / Adamant
Posted by smiffy on 30th April 2009
I couldn’t spot anything here that required more than a cursory explanation, but please leave a message after the tone if you disagree…..beep….
Posted in FT | 3 Comments »
Posted by smiffy on 30th April 2009
I couldn’t spot anything here that required more than a cursory explanation, but please leave a message after the tone if you disagree…..beep….
Posted in FT | 3 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 30th April 2009
Hard as Nimrod usually is, solving time, 58 mins. Very hard to break into, but seeing 1 down was a breakthrough helping with the LHS of the grid.
Posted in Independent | 7 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 30th April 2009
A typically difficult puzzle from Araucaria, but with some very pleasing clues.
Posted in Guardian | 26 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 30th April 2009
Great minds are still puzzling as to how Quixote has crossword 1002 in the 1000th issue of the paper which contained many articles and reminiscences to mark that occasion. The puzzle itself was very easy , I found, solving time 12 mins.
Posted in Independent | 1 Comment »
Posted by Uncle Yap on 30th April 2009
Monday Prize Crossword on 20 April 2009
dd = double definition
cd = cryptic definition
rev = reversed or reversal
ins = insertion
cha = charade
ha = hidden answer
*(fodder) = anagram
Posted in FT | 7 Comments »
Posted by Pete Maclean on 30th April 2009
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of April 18
A nice, moderately difficult puzzle from Cinephile with a memorable clue in 3D. I was stumped on 10A for a while as I was unfamiliar with the term “pack drill”.
Posted in FT | 4 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 29th April 2009
I really enjoyed this one; quite easy on the whole and only a few quibbles.
Posted in Guardian | 26 Comments »
Posted by John on 29th April 2009
What’s Phi doing on a Wednesday? There must be something devious lined up for Mayday on Friday, and no doubt we’ll be seeing Dac on Saturday. Or perhaps he just needs a holiday, for he certainly deserves one. In any case his sub today has maintained the usual Wednesday high standard with a good crossword that I found fairly easy, but which every now and then I perhaps didn’t fully appreciate. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 2 Comments »
Posted by Gaufrid on 29th April 2009
Another grid that is effectively four separate crosswords, loosely linked. I found the NE and SE quadrants reasonably straightforward but took a little longer over the other two. With hindsight, most of the answers are obvious but they didn’t seem that way when I was trying to solve some of the clues.
Posted in FT | 2 Comments »
Posted by Agentzero on 28th April 2009
Another good puzzle from Neo. Some good cryptic definitions in this one. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 5 Comments »
Posted by Ali on 28th April 2009
Radian’s certainly developed a fairly unique and often fairly tricky style in his short time as an Indy setter, but I’m a fan. There’s some nice stuff here. There’s a kinda theme too I think, with the word AND (or a variation on A N and D appearing in an awful lot in the answers. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 11 Comments »
Posted by Uncle Yap on 28th April 2009
dd = double definition
cd = cryptic definition
rev = reversed or reversal
ins = insertion
cha = charade
ha = hidden answer
*(fodder) = anagram
Posted in Guardian | 38 Comments »
Posted by NealH on 27th April 2009
*=anag, []=dropped, <=reversed, hom=homophone, CD=cryptic def
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 4 Comments »
Posted by Andrew on 27th April 2009
A non-Rufus Monday with a puzzle from Arachne that I found quite hard going, with some very involved wordplay. There are a couple of clues that I still don’t understand, but I’m sure commenters will soon point out how obvious they are..
Posted in Guardian | 38 Comments »
Posted by beermagnet on 27th April 2009
One of those where I couldn’t get the last couple for days. 22D was the bugbear. The eureka moment when I finally thought of RAG for “mock” was nice, but I’m glad I didn’t have to blog this as a daily because there’s no way I could’ve got this without coming back to it fresh. I suspect that’s where I differ from the fast or competitive solvers – sometimes when I get stuck on a clue and can’t see it what it’s saying from the right perspective, I need a big long break in order to look at it anew without going down the same train of thought yet again.
Posted in Private Eye/Cyclops | 3 Comments »