Posted by smiffy on 23rd April 2009
A few clues in here where the wordplay or structure seem to be a bit too forced, in order to make the idea work (e.g. 19A, 2D). However, the impressive device at 3D is a first-of-a-kind sighting for me; is it unprecedented?
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 12 Comments »
Posted by Ciaran McNulty on 23rd April 2009
Medium difficulty today, I’d say. No obvious theme aside from maybe 11ac and 1dn! I like Shed normally, and this was no exception – the unknown words all seem to somehow be etymologically possible, if that makes sense.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 29 Comments »
Posted by Simon Harris on 23rd April 2009
*=anag, []=dropped, <=reversed, hom=homophone, cd=cryptic definition, dd=double definition.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 13 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 23rd April 2009
The standard excellent Quixote puzzle as it heads into the second thousand. Solving time, 25 mins. SW corner by far the hardest for me.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 3 Comments »
Posted by Gaufrid on 23rd April 2009
As of this week there is a new administrator at Fifteensquared, myself Gaufrid. Chatmeister will cease to exist, instead any relevant comments will be posted under my pseudonym. My aim is to make this site successful and I hope you will help me in this endeavour by complying with the Discussion Policy, that is to say by avoiding significantly off-topic comments in posts related to a specific puzzle, whilst retaining the friendly nature of the site.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Announcements | 30 Comments »
Posted by Uncle Yap on 23rd April 2009
Monday Prize Crossword on 13 April 2009
dd = double definition
cd = cryptic definition
rev = reversed or reversal
ins = insertion
cha = charade
ha = hidden answer
*(fodder) = anagram
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | Comments Off
Posted by Pete Maclean on 23rd April 2009
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of 11 April
Cincinnus gives us another very fine puzzle. Every clue is technically perfect (as usual) and a good few are impressive.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | No Comments »