<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7032 by Nimrod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83702</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of my lack of familiarity with the feeding habits of polar bears, I decided not to venture any further after I&#039;d noticed the possible end deletion of THE IC(e)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of my lack of familiarity with the feeding habits of polar bears, I decided not to venture any further after I&#8217;d noticed the possible end deletion of THE IC(e)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick h</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83701</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the &#039;e&#039; calved away from the ic shelf!
9ac was particularly devious as &#039;lunch&#039; and &#039;punch&#039; could each have been either definition or part of anagram fodder. I got SANDWICH so assumed it must be a kind of lunch, but that left me with KNUCKPE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8216;e&#8217; calved away from the ic shelf!<br />
9ac was particularly devious as &#8216;lunch&#8217; and &#8216;punch&#8217; could each have been either definition or part of anagram fodder. I got SANDWICH so assumed it must be a kind of lunch, but that left me with KNUCKPE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83690</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something along the lines of the ic(e) has been reduced, so polar bears can&#039;t get as much food and are therefore thinner.  Bit of a Nimrod special, that one, I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something along the lines of the ic(e) has been reduced, so polar bears can&#8217;t get as much food and are therefore thinner.  Bit of a Nimrod special, that one, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83683</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That reminds me.  I still don&#039;t properly understand 17a.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me.  I still don&#8217;t properly understand 17a.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83680</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I&#039;m glad I wasn&#039;t down to blog this one! Took me a good 5 minutes to crack a single clue and then made very slow progress, sticking in quite a few answers without being 100% sure on the wordplay. I always struggle with Nimrod&#039;s cryptic definition clues.

Very glad to have discovered the word THEIC though, which I&#039;ve never come across before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m glad I wasn&#8217;t down to blog this one! Took me a good 5 minutes to crack a single clue and then made very slow progress, sticking in quite a few answers without being 100% sure on the wordplay. I always struggle with Nimrod&#8217;s cryptic definition clues.</p>
<p>Very glad to have discovered the word THEIC though, which I&#8217;ve never come across before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83679</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9a I read THE ROWING as being indicated by just &quot;Boat Race&quot; and hence wondered how &quot;day&quot; was supposed to indicate e and g.

12a I didn&#039;t think that &quot;divers&quot; (meaning several) was justified as an anagram indicator.  I&#039;d be happy with &quot;diverse&quot; (meaning different, varied, multiform) but clearly that would destroy the surface.  However, I now notice that an archaic meaning of &quot;divers&quot; means the same as &quot;diverse&quot; so I guess it&#039;s perhaps OK.  But to me, using something so archaic just succeeded in making it arcane.

8d I couldn&#039;t fathom at all, not being able to make the chicken connection.  This seems to me to be an extreme version of an indirect anagram.  Indicating the anagram fodder indirectly by &quot;Runaway&quot; would be one thing but indicating via an oblique reference to another clue is a bit much.  In fact it&#039;s an indirect indirect anagram. 

14d does &quot;stoned&quot; fairly indicate &quot;inside a stone&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9a I read THE ROWING as being indicated by just &#8220;Boat Race&#8221; and hence wondered how &#8220;day&#8221; was supposed to indicate e and g.</p>
<p>12a I didn&#8217;t think that &#8220;divers&#8221; (meaning several) was justified as an anagram indicator.  I&#8217;d be happy with &#8220;diverse&#8221; (meaning different, varied, multiform) but clearly that would destroy the surface.  However, I now notice that an archaic meaning of &#8220;divers&#8221; means the same as &#8220;diverse&#8221; so I guess it&#8217;s perhaps OK.  But to me, using something so archaic just succeeded in making it arcane.</p>
<p>8d I couldn&#8217;t fathom at all, not being able to make the chicken connection.  This seems to me to be an extreme version of an indirect anagram.  Indicating the anagram fodder indirectly by &#8220;Runaway&#8221; would be one thing but indicating via an oblique reference to another clue is a bit much.  In fact it&#8217;s an indirect indirect anagram. </p>
<p>14d does &#8220;stoned&#8221; fairly indicate &#8220;inside a stone&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/04/30/independent-7032-by-nimrod/#comment-83671</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7466#comment-83671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started well on this, but got a hung up on the idea that 7 down and 8 down were anagrams of each other as kitchen and chicken seemed to be so close.

I thought 6 down was a bit weak.  The interpretation involving invalid as sick seemed too obvious, so I decided it must be the name of some test or tribunal that involved assessing the authenticity of something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started well on this, but got a hung up on the idea that 7 down and 8 down were anagrams of each other as kitchen and chicken seemed to be so close.</p>
<p>I thought 6 down was a bit weak.  The interpretation involving invalid as sick seemed too obvious, so I decided it must be the name of some test or tribunal that involved assessing the authenticity of something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
