http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/05/01/inquisitor-121-building-by-loda/ Never knowingly undersolved. Fri, 24 May 2013 09:27:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/05/01/inquisitor-121-building-by-loda/#comment-83892 Hihoba Fri, 01 May 2009 12:12:38 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7149#comment-83892 I agree. It put me off for a short time.

]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/05/01/inquisitor-121-building-by-loda/#comment-83856 HolyGhost Fri, 01 May 2009 10:29:56 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7149#comment-83856 A couple of minor quibbles with the rubric (which caused a short delay in my finishing the highlighting): why use the word “squares” twice in the same sentence with different meanings – once as “cells” and once as geometrical shapes? And in the phrase “… 2(7)s, 2(5)s, 3(4)s, in squares, …” get rid of the comma before “in squares” since it refers only to the four-letter words, not to all those that preceded it in the list.

]]> http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/05/01/inquisitor-121-building-by-loda/#comment-83814 Quixote Fri, 01 May 2009 06:17:57 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=7149#comment-83814 Before this gets buried, let me say that I really liked this. I don’t find time for the Indy Mag puzzle every week, but when I can knock it off in front of the telly on a Sat. evening and enjoy the penny-dropping (as here) it’s great fun.

]]>