<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inquisitor 128 — An Important Distinction by Obtrox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89100</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hihoba: I&#039;m sure you are right but as I said there is no mention of purchase = rope in Chambers.

HolyGhost: Yours is probably a better reading. &#039;gets&#039; isn&#039;t a strong inclusion indicator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hihoba: I&#8217;m sure you are right but as I said there is no mention of purchase = rope in Chambers.</p>
<p>HolyGhost: Yours is probably a better reading. &#8216;gets&#8217; isn&#8217;t a strong inclusion indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HolyGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89083</link>
		<dc:creator>HolyGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin&#039;s gives the wordplay for 13a as CO[A TE[e]]E and comments on ‘Athletic support’ for (golf) tee being cheeky.  I think a better reading is CO[e] A TEE, with the &quot;a third off&quot; leading to CO[e] and the A being an abbreviation of &quot;athletic&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin&#8217;s gives the wordplay for 13a as CO[A TE[e]]E and comments on ‘Athletic support’ for (golf) tee being cheeky.  I think a better reading is CO[e] A TEE, with the &#8220;a third off&#8221; leading to CO[e] and the A being an abbreviation of &#8220;athletic&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hihoba</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89078</link>
		<dc:creator>Hihoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A purchase in sailing (Naval) terminology is a rope or rope + block and tackle for raising a yard (hence ha(u)l-yard) carrying a sail. Nowadays sails rarely have yards, but the term halyard has persisted for a rope used to raise anything, particularly sails and flags. I&#039;m really unclear that purchase has much to do with the word grip - naval terms often get totally divorced from their original meanings!
Interested in the last comment. I&#039;ve never been, and want to, so ease of access would be a definite plus!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A purchase in sailing (Naval) terminology is a rope or rope + block and tackle for raising a yard (hence ha(u)l-yard) carrying a sail. Nowadays sails rarely have yards, but the term halyard has persisted for a rope used to raise anything, particularly sails and flags. I&#8217;m really unclear that purchase has much to do with the word grip &#8211; naval terms often get totally divorced from their original meanings!<br />
Interested in the last comment. I&#8217;ve never been, and want to, so ease of access would be a definite plus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Rees</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89065</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I disagree with Johnson on this one.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s probably a bit easier to get there now than it was in the 1770s!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I disagree with Johnson on this one.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably a bit easier to get there now than it was in the 1770s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89064</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyable puzzle, where I thought the clues were fairly easy overall.  Took me quite a while to find what to highlight and it was a nice PDM when I did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable puzzle, where I thought the clues were fairly easy overall.  Took me quite a while to find what to highlight and it was a nice PDM when I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89063</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re 11d, thanks for the correction. I&#039;ve just looked at my original notes and I had SOOT rather than SOT O. When  I checked Chambers as I typed up the blog I failed to find sweet under soot but I didn&#039;t check soot(2) for some reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 11d, thanks for the correction. I&#8217;ve just looked at my original notes and I had SOOT rather than SOT O. When  I checked Chambers as I typed up the blog I failed to find sweet under soot but I didn&#8217;t check soot(2) for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HolyGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89062</link>
		<dc:creator>HolyGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 11d, I think that the wordplay is I&#039;M around SOOT (=sweet, obs.) + ERIC (=man), with the OT to go. 

I too initially had CANE at 21d.  And I felt there were rather too many three letter words with 2 letters to be removed, e.g. 5d PIN for &quot;leg&quot; produced just P in the entry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 11d, I think that the wordplay is I&#8217;M around SOOT (=sweet, obs.) + ERIC (=man), with the OT to go. </p>
<p>I too initially had CANE at 21d.  And I felt there were rather too many three letter words with 2 letters to be removed, e.g. 5d PIN for &#8220;leg&#8221; produced just P in the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89039</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re HALYARD. Chambers does not, as far as I can see, give purchase = rope. It does say that halyard = &#039;rope or purchase&#039;. I thus understood purchase here in the sense of a grip on something like a rope rather than the most obvious meaning of purchase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re HALYARD. Chambers does not, as far as I can see, give purchase = rope. It does say that halyard = &#8216;rope or purchase&#8217;. I thus understood purchase here in the sense of a grip on something like a rope rather than the most obvious meaning of purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hihoba</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/06/19/inquisitor-128-an-important-distinction-by-obtrox/#comment-89038</link>
		<dc:creator>Hihoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=8678#comment-89038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your comment about the two missing letters. It really made the down clues MUCH more difficult. I put the apostrophe in the middle square without giving it too much thought, but, like you, EUROPE was my last solved clue. 
I found it very entertaining, but took some time to find the quotation, despite finding the author pretty quickly. I was slowed down somewhat by looking for Doctor or Dr rather than SAMUEL! 
Finally, HALYARD is a sailing term for a rope (aka purchase), not to do with grip, I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comment about the two missing letters. It really made the down clues MUCH more difficult. I put the apostrophe in the middle square without giving it too much thought, but, like you, EUROPE was my last solved clue.<br />
I found it very entertaining, but took some time to find the quotation, despite finding the author pretty quickly. I was slowed down somewhat by looking for Doctor or Dr rather than SAMUEL!<br />
Finally, HALYARD is a sailing term for a rope (aka purchase), not to do with grip, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
