<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Eye/Cyclops 400 &#8211; 16 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94578</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Cyclops! Thanks for the puzzles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Cyclops! Thanks for the puzzles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyclops</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94568</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyclops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Yes, this really is from ‘Cyclops’!]
I view this forum often but have decided not to make postings.  However, I think I should comment on questions raised about the fairness of Private Eye’s treatment of email (as opposed to postal) crossword prize entries. 

I do know the Eye team is careful to ensure that both types of submissions are considered on equal terms. My understanding is that the number of email submissions is about the same as postal ones. So, each issue, a random  selection is made to determine which type goes into the &#039;draw&#039;.  If it&#039;s emails, the prize winner is chosen by &#039;blindly&#039; scanning up and down the list of messages for that issue and clicking on the lucky solver&#039;s message.  This system seems quite fair to me and as good a method as is reasonably practicable - which is my way of saying I&#039;m not going to get into further discussion on the matter!

It&#039;s true that not all email submissions are read - but this applies to postal ones too.  So, as you&#039;ll gather, any comment/ complaint/ tribute(!) included with your crossword entry probably won&#039;t get seen. You&#039;d need to send a normal letter to the mag. or email strobes@private-eye.co.uk.

Oh, about the &#039;nina&#039; in puzzle 400:  I didn&#039;t intend the &quot;giveaway&quot; preamble included in the print version to be published.  It was just a throwaway comment I put in my covering email to the Eye.

Finally, since this belated posting of mine might not get read by many of you, I&#039;ll repeat it when Eye 401 is reviewed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Yes, this really is from ‘Cyclops’!]<br />
I view this forum often but have decided not to make postings.  However, I think I should comment on questions raised about the fairness of Private Eye’s treatment of email (as opposed to postal) crossword prize entries. </p>
<p>I do know the Eye team is careful to ensure that both types of submissions are considered on equal terms. My understanding is that the number of email submissions is about the same as postal ones. So, each issue, a random  selection is made to determine which type goes into the &#8216;draw&#8217;.  If it&#8217;s emails, the prize winner is chosen by &#8216;blindly&#8217; scanning up and down the list of messages for that issue and clicking on the lucky solver&#8217;s message.  This system seems quite fair to me and as good a method as is reasonably practicable &#8211; which is my way of saying I&#8217;m not going to get into further discussion on the matter!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that not all email submissions are read &#8211; but this applies to postal ones too.  So, as you&#8217;ll gather, any comment/ complaint/ tribute(!) included with your crossword entry probably won&#8217;t get seen. You&#8217;d need to send a normal letter to the mag. or email <a href="mailto:strobes@private-eye.co.uk">strobes@private-eye.co.uk</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, about the &#8216;nina&#8217; in puzzle 400:  I didn&#8217;t intend the &#8220;giveaway&#8221; preamble included in the print version to be published.  It was just a throwaway comment I put in my covering email to the Eye.</p>
<p>Finally, since this belated posting of mine might not get read by many of you, I&#8217;ll repeat it when Eye 401 is reviewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beermagnet</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94202</link>
		<dc:creator>beermagnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not surprised to hear people missed the Nina - you don&#039;t expect to find them in the Eye, except at Xmas.
I often miss Nina&#039;s in the Indy even when I look closely.

I too enter by email and have done for about 5 years - I just send a tiny text with the answers in the style of the &quot;last week&#039;s answers&quot; as under the crossword in the mag.  I have been known to mistype them - but not so much since doing this blog.
I too am waiting for my first win.
A couple of years ago I sent a message saying something like &quot;please just reply to prove someone reads these&quot; - I&#039;m still waiting for a reply.  No surprise really. I figure they do the equivalent of putting all entries in a hat and picking one, and only then looking at the mail - GOK how much spam mail that mailbox must attract and how they filter that out given the nature some of the answers.
Nevertheless I still send by email as it&#039;s something of a habit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised to hear people missed the Nina &#8211; you don&#8217;t expect to find them in the Eye, except at Xmas.<br />
I often miss Nina&#8217;s in the Indy even when I look closely.</p>
<p>I too enter by email and have done for about 5 years &#8211; I just send a tiny text with the answers in the style of the &#8220;last week&#8217;s answers&#8221; as under the crossword in the mag.  I have been known to mistype them &#8211; but not so much since doing this blog.<br />
I too am waiting for my first win.<br />
A couple of years ago I sent a message saying something like &#8220;please just reply to prove someone reads these&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m still waiting for a reply.  No surprise really. I figure they do the equivalent of putting all entries in a hat and picking one, and only then looking at the mail &#8211; GOK how much spam mail that mailbox must attract and how they filter that out given the nature some of the answers.<br />
Nevertheless I still send by email as it&#8217;s something of a habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94199</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My hunch is that the email entries aren&#039;t even checked. Why do I say that? Private Eye has never used my email address for marketing purposes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hunch is that the email entries aren&#8217;t even checked. Why do I say that? Private Eye has never used my email address for marketing purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The trafites</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94179</link>
		<dc:creator>The trafites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick, good point.  I submit via e-mail using the &#039;acrosslite&#039; software (after we solve the puzzle on paper), so never know how they select the &#039;winner&#039;.

Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, good point.  I submit via e-mail using the &#8216;acrosslite&#8217; software (after we solve the puzzle on paper), so never know how they select the &#8216;winner&#8217;.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94173</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been doing Cyclops since No 37 and have yet to be pulled out of the hat. Any idea how many entries they get each fortnight? And do email returns stand the same chance of winning? ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing Cyclops since No 37 and have yet to be pulled out of the hat. Any idea how many entries they get each fortnight? And do email returns stand the same chance of winning? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The trafites</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94165</link>
		<dc:creator>The trafites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We missed the &#039;nina&#039; all together!

Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We missed the &#8216;nina&#8217; all together!</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/09/28/private-eyecyclops-400-16-years/#comment-94164</link>
		<dc:creator>Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11172#comment-94164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We found this very enjoyable, but would agree that the message really didn&#039;t need to be indicated in the preamble, as this made the puzzle significantly easier than normal. Eight across was the most interesting clue, we thought, and we learnt something new with &#039;Baldric&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We found this very enjoyable, but would agree that the message really didn&#8217;t need to be indicated in the preamble, as this made the puzzle significantly easier than normal. Eight across was the most interesting clue, we thought, and we learnt something new with &#8216;Baldric&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
