Comments on: Financial Times 13,202 / Bradman http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/financial-times-13202-bradman/ Never knowingly undersolved. Sun, 19 May 2013 14:49:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Sil van den Hoek http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/financial-times-13202-bradman/#comment-94837 Sil van den Hoek Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:19:30 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11687#comment-94837 Thank you for the blog, Gaufrid.
I liked this crossword very much, very precise and faultless.
I think, more people – especially Guardian solvers – should from time to time
take a look at the FT crosswords, as so many setters publish in both papers
(like Bradman/Pasquale).
And since the prints are perfectly alright (thanks to Uncle Yap), that can’t be a drawback either any more.

Anyway, the only solution I didn’t find was THAW OUT, a clever “reversed anagram” – something that we see more and more.
In 4dn, I think, it should be BONN[y].
(By the way, I first had ‘Rome’ as ‘Rome[o]‘)

]]>