<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indy 7166 (Sat 3-Oct) Anax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94805</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mmm ... nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm &#8230; nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heald</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94802</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4Dn (&quot;Any short term gains within political faction shown by it?&quot;) I thought was a quite brilliant &#039;&amp; lit.&#039;, although I think Azed would have inserted a &#039;...&#039; between &#039;faction&#039; and &#039;shown&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4Dn (&#8220;Any short term gains within political faction shown by it?&#8221;) I thought was a quite brilliant &#8216;&amp; lit.&#8217;, although I think Azed would have inserted a &#8216;&#8230;&#8217; between &#8216;faction&#8217; and &#8216;shown&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94786</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me the more important question is whether or not CON JUGS = bluetits. I shall ask around at Man-chest-er.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the more important question is whether or not CON JUGS = bluetits. I shall ask around at Man-chest-er.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beermagnet</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94781</link>
		<dc:creator>beermagnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11A Union members strive, sorry swive, for privileges (8,6)

Anax, Thanks for putting me right on WILLOW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11A Union members strive, sorry swive, for privileges (8,6)</p>
<p>Anax, Thanks for putting me right on WILLOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94774</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11A Those in a union may not stand up for them! (8,6)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11A Those in a union may not stand up for them! (8,6)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94771</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this too.   Some wordplay was very tricky, and it turned out for me as hard for the Indy but easy for an Anax Indy.    Favourite clue, PROWL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this too.   Some wordplay was very tricky, and it turned out for me as hard for the Indy but easy for an Anax Indy.    Favourite clue, PROWL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94770</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi chaps!

CONJUGAL RIGHTS. The confusion over this highlights just how valuable the crossword editor is. First off, just to explain it – I had the idea that “doing it” (that rather juvenile term to suggest sexual intimacy) could be used as one of the things which a list of conjugal rights would include.

As I put the answer in the grid I was thinking “I’ll be able to get a nice CD out of this” but, when it came to writing, it was harder to string together than I imagined. The published clue was the best I could come up with – that’s not to say I wasn’t happy with it; not a spectacular CD but hopefully enough to raise a smile.

If I remember rightly Eimi came back with four clues that needed tidying up a bit, which included a question mark alongside this one as he didn’t quite see how it worked. I explained it as best I could and no changes were made. And look what’s happened.

The clue should have been re-written although, to be fair, CONJUGAL RIGHTS is pretty awful when you’re looking for standard wordplay devices. There is CON JUGS around ALRIGHT but I don’t like that spelling, and JUGS is heading towards a less than tasteful def. The point is, though, Mike’s initial concern was spot on and I’m kicking myself for having stood up for the clue as it was.

Just a quick note about 24Ac WILLOW; the parsing is WOW (boy!) outside (i.e. not in) ILL (trouble).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi chaps!</p>
<p>CONJUGAL RIGHTS. The confusion over this highlights just how valuable the crossword editor is. First off, just to explain it – I had the idea that “doing it” (that rather juvenile term to suggest sexual intimacy) could be used as one of the things which a list of conjugal rights would include.</p>
<p>As I put the answer in the grid I was thinking “I’ll be able to get a nice CD out of this” but, when it came to writing, it was harder to string together than I imagined. The published clue was the best I could come up with – that’s not to say I wasn’t happy with it; not a spectacular CD but hopefully enough to raise a smile.</p>
<p>If I remember rightly Eimi came back with four clues that needed tidying up a bit, which included a question mark alongside this one as he didn’t quite see how it worked. I explained it as best I could and no changes were made. And look what’s happened.</p>
<p>The clue should have been re-written although, to be fair, CONJUGAL RIGHTS is pretty awful when you’re looking for standard wordplay devices. There is CON JUGS around ALRIGHT but I don’t like that spelling, and JUGS is heading towards a less than tasteful def. The point is, though, Mike’s initial concern was spot on and I’m kicking myself for having stood up for the clue as it was.</p>
<p>Just a quick note about 24Ac WILLOW; the parsing is WOW (boy!) outside (i.e. not in) ILL (trouble).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/10/09/indy-7166-sat-3-oct-anax/#comment-94769</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=11620#comment-94769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In full agreement with you here Beermagnet; another splendid creation from Anax. The only one that got me cross-eyed was 11ac CONJUGAL RIGHTS - &#039;union members&#039; = obvious, but I don&#039;t quite get the overall cryptic meaning. 

Speaking of which, could HUNG PARLIAMENT have been a missed opportunity for one of Anax&#039;s &#039;big members here?&#039; jokes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In full agreement with you here Beermagnet; another splendid creation from Anax. The only one that got me cross-eyed was 11ac CONJUGAL RIGHTS &#8211; &#8216;union members&#8217; = obvious, but I don&#8217;t quite get the overall cryptic meaning. </p>
<p>Speaking of which, could HUNG PARLIAMENT have been a missed opportunity for one of Anax&#8217;s &#8216;big members here?&#8217; jokes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
