<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent &#8211; Review of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/12/31/independent-review-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/12/31/independent-review-of-2009/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Biddlecombe</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/12/31/independent-review-of-2009/#comment-99585</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Biddlecombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13742#comment-99585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This matches my memory of my own experience pretty well.  Monk and Nestor can be very difficult, but not so often as the hardest setters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This matches my memory of my own experience pretty well.  Monk and Nestor can be very difficult, but not so often as the hardest setters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eimi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/12/31/independent-review-of-2009/#comment-99458</link>
		<dc:creator>eimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13742#comment-99458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, nmsindy, for your analysis, which is always helpful. I don&#039;t even keep records of how many times each setter has appeared, so that&#039;s often revealing too. If Gaufrid doesn&#039;t mind, it would be good to see other solvers&#039; ideas of the most difficult setters.

Thanks to Anax - you&#039;re very welcome and the Indy is a stronger band for your addition to it.

I wish all solvers, setters and bloggers a happy and prosperous new year and, providing the paper can keep its head above water, I can promise at least one new setter, as I have done each year, the return of one setter who has been away for a while, and, hopefully, lots of further entertainment, erudition and enjoyment in 2010.

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, nmsindy, for your analysis, which is always helpful. I don&#8217;t even keep records of how many times each setter has appeared, so that&#8217;s often revealing too. If Gaufrid doesn&#8217;t mind, it would be good to see other solvers&#8217; ideas of the most difficult setters.</p>
<p>Thanks to Anax &#8211; you&#8217;re very welcome and the Indy is a stronger band for your addition to it.</p>
<p>I wish all solvers, setters and bloggers a happy and prosperous new year and, providing the paper can keep its head above water, I can promise at least one new setter, as I have done each year, the return of one setter who has been away for a while, and, hopefully, lots of further entertainment, erudition and enjoyment in 2010.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2009/12/31/independent-review-of-2009/#comment-99414</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13742#comment-99414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My word, nmsindy, what a fascinating insight! As for my own puzzles averaging around an hour to solve, that&#039;s maybe not surprising since, as a newcomer, my little setting quirks won&#039;t be completely familiar yet.

Of special note, though, are your solving times for Dac&#039;s puzzles. Surely it&#039;s the mark of a truly great setter that he combines wonderfully smooth (and technically sound) clues which, despite their deception, are reasonably easy to solve. If I ever get to emulate that skill I&#039;ll be a happy little setter!

To my fellow setters - and particularly to Eimi for accepting me into this elite band of innovators - and to all bloggers and commenters, a very Happy and Prosperous New Year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My word, nmsindy, what a fascinating insight! As for my own puzzles averaging around an hour to solve, that&#8217;s maybe not surprising since, as a newcomer, my little setting quirks won&#8217;t be completely familiar yet.</p>
<p>Of special note, though, are your solving times for Dac&#8217;s puzzles. Surely it&#8217;s the mark of a truly great setter that he combines wonderfully smooth (and technically sound) clues which, despite their deception, are reasonably easy to solve. If I ever get to emulate that skill I&#8217;ll be a happy little setter!</p>
<p>To my fellow setters &#8211; and particularly to Eimi for accepting me into this elite band of innovators &#8211; and to all bloggers and commenters, a very Happy and Prosperous New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
