<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,275 / Jason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99830</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[or is it its.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or is it its.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99829</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks  Agentzero.  Obvious really - but it niggled because I was obsessed with it&#039;s being plural.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks  Agentzero.  Obvious really &#8211; but it niggled because I was obsessed with it&#8217;s being plural&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99813</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Agentzero
Chambers also has &quot;to place (eg in confidence) in a person or thing&quot;  but then follows on with the definitions I quoted before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Agentzero<br />
Chambers also has &#8220;to place (eg in confidence) in a person or thing&#8221;  but then follows on with the definitions I quoted before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agentzero</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99806</link>
		<dc:creator>Agentzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Gaufrid

Then Chambers stands alone, as far as I can tell.  For example, Collins has &quot;to put (trust or confidence) in a person or thing.&quot;  COED has &quot;place (something, especially one&#039;s confidence or trust) in.&quot;  The parentheses indicate that &quot;confidence&quot; or &quot;trust&quot; must be supplied and are not encompassed by the word &quot;repose&quot; itself.  I think &quot;reposed my trust,&quot; rather than a tautology, is standard usage and it is supported by these two.  I know, I know:  if a dictionary says it, a setter is entitled to rely on it, but sometimes a dictionary is simply wrong.

JB, COED has as a definition &quot;an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts.&quot;  For example, a pair of glasses or a pair of scissors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gaufrid</p>
<p>Then Chambers stands alone, as far as I can tell.  For example, Collins has &#8220;to put (trust or confidence) in a person or thing.&#8221;  COED has &#8220;place (something, especially one&#8217;s confidence or trust) in.&#8221;  The parentheses indicate that &#8220;confidence&#8221; or &#8220;trust&#8221; must be supplied and are not encompassed by the word &#8220;repose&#8221; itself.  I think &#8220;reposed my trust,&#8221; rather than a tautology, is standard usage and it is supported by these two.  I know, I know:  if a dictionary says it, a setter is entitled to rely on it, but sometimes a dictionary is simply wrong.</p>
<p>JB, COED has as a definition &#8220;an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts.&#8221;  For example, a pair of glasses or a pair of scissors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99797</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small query: why is PAIR an article?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small query: why is PAIR an article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99788</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Agentzero
For &#039;repose&#039; Chambers has as a definition &quot;to place in trust&quot; and &quot;place one&#039;s trust&quot; so surely &#039;reposed my trust&#039; would be tautology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Agentzero<br />
For &#8216;repose&#8217; Chambers has as a definition &#8220;to place in trust&#8221; and &#8220;place one&#8217;s trust&#8221; so surely &#8216;reposed my trust&#8217; would be tautology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agentzero</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99780</link>
		<dc:creator>Agentzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Rishi, I think you have it.  Now I think it&#039;s quite a clever clue.

Smiffy, I think the phrase is always &quot;I reposed my trust in him.&quot;  You wouldn&#039;t simply say &quot;I reposed in him.&quot;  Thus, the word &quot;repose&quot; by itself (which is the word that needs to be defined in the clue) means &quot;place&quot; and not &quot;place trust in.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rishi, I think you have it.  Now I think it&#8217;s quite a clever clue.</p>
<p>Smiffy, I think the phrase is always &#8220;I reposed my trust in him.&#8221;  You wouldn&#8217;t simply say &#8220;I reposed in him.&#8221;  Thus, the word &#8220;repose&#8221; by itself (which is the word that needs to be defined in the clue) means &#8220;place&#8221; and not &#8220;place trust in.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smiffy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99778</link>
		<dc:creator>smiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed about it beinng a mixed bag.  As the outliers, 3D struck me as a very neat (albeit easy) surface and execution; on the other hand, its symmetric partner at 16D is plain ugly on a number of levels.

I beg to differ with the query at 24D, as I&#039;ve certainly seen repose used in the sense of &quot;placing trust in&quot; before.

Best wishes to all in 2010!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed about it beinng a mixed bag.  As the outliers, 3D struck me as a very neat (albeit easy) surface and execution; on the other hand, its symmetric partner at 16D is plain ugly on a number of levels.</p>
<p>I beg to differ with the query at 24D, as I&#8217;ve certainly seen repose used in the sense of &#8220;placing trust in&#8221; before.</p>
<p>Best wishes to all in 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/05/financial-times-13275-jason/#comment-99772</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=13870#comment-99772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had also wondered how 26d worked when I solved it idly (without entering any word in the grid).

Only now after I saw your query and again looked at the clue in the pdf did it dawn on me.

&quot;C or K&quot; is another way of saying &quot;either end of CandlesticK&quot;.

No container/contained.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had also wondered how 26d worked when I solved it idly (without entering any word in the grid).</p>
<p>Only now after I saw your query and again looked at the clue in the pdf did it dawn on me.</p>
<p>&#8220;C or K&#8221; is another way of saying &#8220;either end of CandlesticK&#8221;.</p>
<p>No container/contained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
