<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24917 &#8211; Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:37:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101154</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trench Adviser ...

Check out pub and restaurant ads (and even some food writers in the press). &quot;Sunday Lunch&quot; (even &quot;Christmas Lunch&quot;) is constantly used to mean a midday roast meal with all the trimmings, followed by afters. That&#039;s a main meal so it&#039;s &quot;Dinner&quot;, whatever the time of day. Ask any dictionary!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trench Adviser &#8230;</p>
<p>Check out pub and restaurant ads (and even some food writers in the press). &#8220;Sunday Lunch&#8221; (even &#8220;Christmas Lunch&#8221;) is constantly used to mean a midday roast meal with all the trimmings, followed by afters. That&#8217;s a main meal so it&#8217;s &#8220;Dinner&#8221;, whatever the time of day. Ask any dictionary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trench Adviser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101142</link>
		<dc:creator>Trench Adviser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil, how is &quot;lunch&quot; misused?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, how is &#8220;lunch&#8221; misused?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101055</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lovely stuff throughout! And thanks Uncle Yap for your usual clarity. 

Sorry Ian @9 but I suspect your comment to Uncle Yap might not be quite what you meant once you&#039;ve looked up &quot;fulsome&quot; in your dictionary, unless, of course, you were complimenting him on his figure! But then, it is one of the most misused words, perhaps only challenged by &quot;lunch&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely stuff throughout! And thanks Uncle Yap for your usual clarity. </p>
<p>Sorry Ian @9 but I suspect your comment to Uncle Yap might not be quite what you meant once you&#8217;ve looked up &#8220;fulsome&#8221; in your dictionary, unless, of course, you were complimenting him on his figure! But then, it is one of the most misused words, perhaps only challenged by &#8220;lunch&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101034</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I had pencilled in THREE at 4d, giving an E for the I of ECONOMICAL which is why that word took longer than it should to spot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I had pencilled in THREE at 4d, giving an E for the I of ECONOMICAL which is why that word took longer than it should to spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101033</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gareth @ 26: I eyeballed the letters for inspiration, rather than writing them out randomly - but to no avail. THE was a good guess for the three letter word, and ING for the end of 26a, but they didn&#039;t help. It wasn&#039;t till I got the E from METIER of 1d (quite a hard clue) that I got ECONOMICAL (I already had all the other crossing letters), then the rest of the solution was instantaneous - I didn&#039;t bother checking the fodder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gareth @ 26: I eyeballed the letters for inspiration, rather than writing them out randomly &#8211; but to no avail. THE was a good guess for the three letter word, and ING for the end of 26a, but they didn&#8217;t help. It wasn&#8217;t till I got the E from METIER of 1d (quite a hard clue) that I got ECONOMICAL (I already had all the other crossing letters), then the rest of the solution was instantaneous &#8211; I didn&#8217;t bother checking the fodder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101032</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Mr Beaver (#30).
Although we did like the (indeed) vague definition of 25ac, making the clue as a whole rather, um, cryptic, I can imagine that some people, like you, didn&#039;t think too much of it.
FLAT can be &#039;dead&#039;, when one thinks of &#039;discharged&#039; (like a battery).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mr Beaver (#30).<br />
Although we did like the (indeed) vague definition of 25ac, making the clue as a whole rather, um, cryptic, I can imagine that some people, like you, didn&#8217;t think too much of it.<br />
FLAT can be &#8216;dead&#8217;, when one thinks of &#8216;discharged&#8217; (like a battery).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101031</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To go against the grain, I didn&#039;t think much of 25a and 24,12 (mainly because we didn&#039;t get them).
&#039;Was the star&#039; doesn&#039;t define HEADLINED very well, and I don&#039;t really see how dead = FLAT, well only very tangentially ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To go against the grain, I didn&#8217;t think much of 25a and 24,12 (mainly because we didn&#8217;t get them).<br />
&#8216;Was the star&#8217; doesn&#8217;t define HEADLINED very well, and I don&#8217;t really see how dead = FLAT, well only very tangentially &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101027</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long anagrams, well long answers however clued are often spottable simply from the word pattern unfortunately. When the Milligan clue was used I shared the crossword with a friend, it took me about ten seconds to work it out so I didn&#039;t tell him. He took about four hours because he didn&#039;t know the poem.

Azed used a long anagram in his Christmas 1998 competition. This http://www.andlit.org.uk/azed/slip.php?comp_no=1387 list some of the possibilities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long anagrams, well long answers however clued are often spottable simply from the word pattern unfortunately. When the Milligan clue was used I shared the crossword with a friend, it took me about ten seconds to work it out so I didn&#8217;t tell him. He took about four hours because he didn&#8217;t know the poem.</p>
<p>Azed used a long anagram in his Christmas 1998 competition. This <a href="http://www.andlit.org.uk/azed/slip.php?comp_no=1387" rel="nofollow">http://www.andlit.org.uk/azed/slip.php?comp_no=1387</a> list some of the possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101026</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Gareth (#26), normally we do but this time we did ...
Which means: normally we wait just like you (and I do agree, long anagrams can be very annoying, though some are rather good), but today we wrote out the remaining letters to see if we could complete &quot;Bring (must of course be &#039;being&#039;, but this was what we had initially) ... with the ...&quot;. We saw the solution relatively late, which slowed us down a bit because the words were spread around different parts of the grid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Gareth (#26), normally we do but this time we did &#8230;<br />
Which means: normally we wait just like you (and I do agree, long anagrams can be very annoying, though some are rather good), but today we wrote out the remaining letters to see if we could complete &#8220;Bring (must of course be &#8216;being&#8217;, but this was what we had initially) &#8230; with the &#8230;&#8221;. We saw the solution relatively late, which slowed us down a bit because the words were spread around different parts of the grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stiofain</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/26/guardian-24917-paul/#comment-101025</link>
		<dc:creator>stiofain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14479#comment-101025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another fan here I thought this was great, especially &quot;does river run&quot;.
Gareth I dislike long anagrams too but my main beef is that they cut down the number of clues in an xword I also rarely solve them other than by crossing letters.
I remember the milligan clue  well nice one from Rob digging that up.
I also spent some time thinking about the Beatles Sil.
My only complaint is the lack of Pauls usual smut , no bums, bras, bowels or bogs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fan here I thought this was great, especially &#8220;does river run&#8221;.<br />
Gareth I dislike long anagrams too but my main beef is that they cut down the number of clues in an xword I also rarely solve them other than by crossing letters.<br />
I remember the milligan clue  well nice one from Rob digging that up.<br />
I also spent some time thinking about the Beatles Sil.<br />
My only complaint is the lack of Pauls usual smut , no bums, bras, bowels or bogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
