<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7264/Dac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101124</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent puzzle though I had to run through the possibilities for C-B-E- a few times in my head until the Australian connection hit me.

RANGELAND was new for me but knowing ANGEL made it straightforward. BODEGA is the name of a very nice pub up in Newcastle. Nice for its beer rather than its wine though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent puzzle though I had to run through the possibilities for C-B-E- a few times in my head until the Australian connection hit me.</p>
<p>RANGELAND was new for me but knowing ANGEL made it straightforward. BODEGA is the name of a very nice pub up in Newcastle. Nice for its beer rather than its wine though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101123</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great puzzle with some good misdirections.  Took me a while to see 1ac then I remembered the late Tommy Cooper and got it &quot;just like that&quot;.
22ac had me on the wrong track for a bit thinking of &quot;cartoon&quot; [nude picture = art with nothing (= 0) on] but then &quot;court&quot; didn&#039;t fit.  There&#039;s an idea, though, for one of your setters to develop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great puzzle with some good misdirections.  Took me a while to see 1ac then I remembered the late Tommy Cooper and got it &#8220;just like that&#8221;.<br />
22ac had me on the wrong track for a bit thinking of &#8220;cartoon&#8221; [nude picture = art with nothing (= 0) on] but then &#8220;court&#8221; didn&#8217;t fit.  There&#8217;s an idea, though, for one of your setters to develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101108</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent stuff. It seems I, alone among you, am unconvinced by how 21 parses (the IN 1 bit seems a little bit clunky?). Hmm. And not having heard of an ANGEL financier knocked me out a little bit. Otherwise fab stuff. I love 23d. Simple and brilliant. 

I read 20 as a kind of &amp;lit, incidentally:

&quot;Playwright introduced&quot; (P) &quot;by&quot; (=&#039;next to&#039;) &quot;top interviewer&quot; (INTER) = PINTER

But that&#039;s because I totally failed to see it hidden in the clue.

Kieron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff. It seems I, alone among you, am unconvinced by how 21 parses (the IN 1 bit seems a little bit clunky?). Hmm. And not having heard of an ANGEL financier knocked me out a little bit. Otherwise fab stuff. I love 23d. Simple and brilliant. </p>
<p>I read 20 as a kind of &amp;lit, incidentally:</p>
<p>&#8220;Playwright introduced&#8221; (P) &#8220;by&#8221; (=&#8217;next to&#8217;) &#8220;top interviewer&#8221; (INTER) = PINTER</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s because I totally failed to see it hidden in the clue.</p>
<p>Kieron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101105</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re comment 9, John, it&#039;s always &#039;caveat emptor&#039;, I guess, if an offer sounds too good to be true, it probably is.    Whether it is the publisher or the retailer who takes decisions, or a bit of both, may be a factor. Might be a choice between selling unwanted stock off cheap or pulping them.   Have to say the Collins 2009 dict is v good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re comment 9, John, it&#8217;s always &#8216;caveat emptor&#8217;, I guess, if an offer sounds too good to be true, it probably is.    Whether it is the publisher or the retailer who takes decisions, or a bit of both, may be a factor. Might be a choice between selling unwanted stock off cheap or pulping them.   Have to say the Collins 2009 dict is v good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanN14</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101102</link>
		<dc:creator>IanN14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I seem to remember &quot;mankini&quot; being an answer fairly recently (or was that &quot;monokini&quot; - I&#039;m sure there was some confusion at the time).
I also remember anax was trying to get rid of one; how did that go?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember &#8220;mankini&#8221; being an answer fairly recently (or was that &#8220;monokini&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m sure there was some confusion at the time).<br />
I also remember anax was trying to get rid of one; how did that go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101101</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[K&#039;s D — my grumble with Collins is that I once thought I&#039;d made a nice buy in WH Smith when I bought a great big Collins Dictionary for I think £6.25, 75% off the usual price. It looked exactly as if it should be the real thing (which I&#039;m sure it was touted as), but I found that it differs from it despite having a cover that is almost identical, so it is virtually useless. I regard this as very shady dealing on the part of Collins.

I was relieved that people seem to agree with me about 17dn. After posting the blog it occurred to me that it might be an old chestnut of which I was unaware. Evidently not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K&#8217;s D — my grumble with Collins is that I once thought I&#8217;d made a nice buy in WH Smith when I bought a great big Collins Dictionary for I think £6.25, 75% off the usual price. It looked exactly as if it should be the real thing (which I&#8217;m sure it was touted as), but I found that it differs from it despite having a cover that is almost identical, so it is virtually useless. I regard this as very shady dealing on the part of Collins.</p>
<p>I was relieved that people seem to agree with me about 17dn. After posting the blog it occurred to me that it might be an old chestnut of which I was unaware. Evidently not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101086</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jp, the &#039;on both sides&#039; refers the the &#039;m&#039; not the wall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jp, the &#8216;on both sides&#8217; refers the the &#8216;m&#8217; not the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101085</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why  &quot;on both sides&quot; in 4 down?Isn&#039;t &quot;having wall covering&quot; enough for&quot;papered&quot;?
Brilliant crossword though, such smooth surface readings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why  &#8220;on both sides&#8221; in 4 down?Isn&#8217;t &#8220;having wall covering&#8221; enough for&#8221;papered&#8221;?<br />
Brilliant crossword though, such smooth surface readings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101072</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in awe of Dac&#039;s elegant clue writing with such beautiful surface reading.  Not having cringed through Borat, MANKINI was the last clue I solved.  An excellent &amp;lit with wordplay which provided the answer.  This, to me, is one of the delights of cryptic crosswords - often introducing us to something new.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in awe of Dac&#8217;s elegant clue writing with such beautiful surface reading.  Not having cringed through Borat, MANKINI was the last clue I solved.  An excellent &amp;lit with wordplay which provided the answer.  This, to me, is one of the delights of cryptic crosswords &#8211; often introducing us to something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/01/27/independent-7264dac/#comment-101069</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14518#comment-101069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent stuff, as ever.  I covered most of this in the morning but had a bit of a pause when it came the top right corner.  I was held up a bit by convincing myself without looking at the clue too well that 6 across must be &quot;laud&quot;.  That and a few unfamiliar words (bodega, rangeland and the unusual meaning of epitome) make that section a little harder.  I was pleased to get mankini - cringing my way through Borat wasn&#039;t entirely in vain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff, as ever.  I covered most of this in the morning but had a bit of a pause when it came the top right corner.  I was held up a bit by convincing myself without looking at the clue too well that 6 across must be &#8220;laud&#8221;.  That and a few unfamiliar words (bodega, rangeland and the unusual meaning of epitome) make that section a little harder.  I was pleased to get mankini &#8211; cringing my way through Borat wasn&#8217;t entirely in vain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
