<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24923 &#8211; Pasquale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101871</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been away for a week so only just doing last week&#039;s crosswords.   Surprised no-one else commented about 8d (ministry).   This made me laugh out loud and in the Paul class!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been away for a week so only just doing last week&#8217;s crosswords.   Surprised no-one else commented about 8d (ministry).   This made me laugh out loud and in the Paul class!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cholecyst</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101566</link>
		<dc:creator>cholecyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Koran.  Re pedantry. I had to wait a long time, but I knew someone would rise to the bait!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koran.  Re pedantry. I had to wait a long time, but I knew someone would rise to the bait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koran</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101548</link>
		<dc:creator>koran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cholecyst - you wrote

&quot;Don’t worry,Lopakhin . Pedantry is the 15squareders raison d’etre (sorry about the missing accent.)&quot;

You&#039;re also sorry for the missing apostrophe I assume - it should be 15squareders&#039;???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cholecyst &#8211; you wrote</p>
<p>&#8220;Don’t worry,Lopakhin . Pedantry is the 15squareders raison d’etre (sorry about the missing accent.)&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also sorry for the missing apostrophe I assume &#8211; it should be 15squareders&#8217;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101547</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob, re #44, only I forgot the definition.  
It should have been: 
Highly valued Czech painter very softly made a statement about the origin of art (4,11)  [bit long, I know, but even so - much appreciated!]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, re #44, only I forgot the definition.<br />
It should have been:<br />
Highly valued Czech painter very softly made a statement about the origin of art (4,11)  [bit long, I know, but even so - much appreciated!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101545</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had to get &quot;her&quot; to finish the last 3, and had to use Chambers gadget for some.

I trust the arty side of this group who didn&#039;t know DIRAC finally understand where us scientists are coming from when we complain about arty names.

Umm, maybe I&#039;m getting old, but weren&#039;t RUSH and CHARGE also more or less interchangeable in a military sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had to get &#8220;her&#8221; to finish the last 3, and had to use Chambers gadget for some.</p>
<p>I trust the arty side of this group who didn&#8217;t know DIRAC finally understand where us scientists are coming from when we complain about arty names.</p>
<p>Umm, maybe I&#8217;m getting old, but weren&#8217;t RUSH and CHARGE also more or less interchangeable in a military sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Median</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101544</link>
		<dc:creator>Median</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent puzzle, Pasquale! Some really clever (but fair) clues and challenging (but not ridiculously obscure) words. Also, like cholecyst @29, I think many of the Guardian&#039;s cryptics are too heavily weighted towards the arts, so I was happy to see Dirac, Attenborough, lead-free and ataxia here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent puzzle, Pasquale! Some really clever (but fair) clues and challenging (but not ridiculously obscure) words. Also, like cholecyst @29, I think many of the Guardian&#8217;s cryptics are too heavily weighted towards the arts, so I was happy to see Dirac, Attenborough, lead-free and ataxia here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101543</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sil Re: #39

As I sort of said - your posts here are also &quot;Much Appreciated&quot;  - brilliant clue!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sil Re: #39</p>
<p>As I sort of said &#8211; your posts here are also &#8220;Much Appreciated&#8221;  &#8211; brilliant clue!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101542</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thank you pasquale and thank you uncle yap.

i enjoyed this one very much and was frustrated by it in some measure. my knowledge of science and maths doesn&#039;t stretch to 12a or 2d, but i got absurd, and checked the dictionary for surd. pons asinorum also defeated me. but there was a lot of fun too. flying saucer, almshouse and catheter made me laugh. so i failed on 3. but it&#039;s bound to happen sometimes, and at least i have learned something. i wouldn&#039;t want this sort of xwd every day, but we don&#039;t get that.just hope we get one more to my level tomorrow!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you pasquale and thank you uncle yap.</p>
<p>i enjoyed this one very much and was frustrated by it in some measure. my knowledge of science and maths doesn&#8217;t stretch to 12a or 2d, but i got absurd, and checked the dictionary for surd. pons asinorum also defeated me. but there was a lot of fun too. flying saucer, almshouse and catheter made me laugh. so i failed on 3. but it&#8217;s bound to happen sometimes, and at least i have learned something. i wouldn&#8217;t want this sort of xwd every day, but we don&#8217;t get that.just hope we get one more to my level tomorrow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101541</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheers Sil

After many years working in IT industry I am now &#039;semi&#039; retired &amp; work from home; part of my daily &#039;routine&#039; is to go out in morning, get Guardian and sit for a coffee at a very nice coffee shop in Windsor and &#039;have a bash&#039; at the crossword. I get as far as I can, usually do pretty well and I prefer to resort to dictionary/thesaurus etc only for confirmation of a possibility.
With Pons Asinorum - realised it was an anagram, didn&#039;t &#039;get it&#039; straight from definition but I did have the &#039;P&#039;and other crossing letters -  P?N?  A?I?O?U? - and remembered the Euclid connection!
Haven&#039;t seen your clue before - will give it some thought now; first thought &#039;is definition a Czech painter?&#039; or maybe just &#039;Czech&#039;; painter often RA; maybe very softly is &#039;PP&#039;; origin of art - &#039;A&#039;; made statement - mmm - spoke, orated etc !! Am thinking &#039;out loud&#039; as I type - will have a &#039;proper&#039; go in a few minutes.
Cheers Rob

PS Did you get that FOOT/BALL (1,4,2,3,6) on here recently (Jerb if I remember correctly giving you a &#039;Paul&#039; clue.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Sil</p>
<p>After many years working in IT industry I am now &#8216;semi&#8217; retired &amp; work from home; part of my daily &#8216;routine&#8217; is to go out in morning, get Guardian and sit for a coffee at a very nice coffee shop in Windsor and &#8216;have a bash&#8217; at the crossword. I get as far as I can, usually do pretty well and I prefer to resort to dictionary/thesaurus etc only for confirmation of a possibility.<br />
With Pons Asinorum &#8211; realised it was an anagram, didn&#8217;t &#8216;get it&#8217; straight from definition but I did have the &#8216;P&#8217;and other crossing letters &#8211;  P?N?  A?I?O?U? &#8211; and remembered the Euclid connection!<br />
Haven&#8217;t seen your clue before &#8211; will give it some thought now; first thought &#8216;is definition a Czech painter?&#8217; or maybe just &#8216;Czech&#8217;; painter often RA; maybe very softly is &#8216;PP&#8217;; origin of art &#8211; &#8216;A&#8217;; made statement &#8211; mmm &#8211; spoke, orated etc !! Am thinking &#8216;out loud&#8217; as I type &#8211; will have a &#8216;proper&#8217; go in a few minutes.<br />
Cheers Rob</p>
<p>PS Did you get that FOOT/BALL (1,4,2,3,6) on here recently (Jerb if I remember correctly giving you a &#8216;Paul&#8217; clue.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DorothyS</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/02/02/guardian-24923-pasquale/#comment-101540</link>
		<dc:creator>DorothyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=14669#comment-101540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t recall ever coming across &#039;pons asinorum&#039; before, but what a great phrase!  I can&#039;t wait to drop it casually into some suitable conversation.  

Many thanks for a challenging, science-laced puzzle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall ever coming across &#8216;pons asinorum&#8217; before, but what a great phrase!  I can&#8217;t wait to drop it casually into some suitable conversation.  </p>
<p>Many thanks for a challenging, science-laced puzzle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
