Posted by nmsindy on 11th March 2010
This was very good indeed.
nmsindy has admitted to weaknesses esp films but is prepared to admit to a strength, football, which was v helpful here. Solving time, 50 mins.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 11 Comments »
Posted by Gaufrid on 11th March 2010
I covered Alberich’s first FT puzzle eighteen months ago and my opening comment was “I don’t think I have ever completed an FT quite so quickly, the answers just seemed to enter themselves”. How things have changed since then! This one took me twice as long as usual and involved a fair degree of head-scratching.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 6 Comments »
Posted by Handel on 11th March 2010
An in-bed solve, lasting perhaps 25 minutes.
ACROSS
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 4 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 11th March 2010
A rather rushed post, I’m afraid, so apologies for errors and omissions, which I probably won’t be able to fix until much later. Overall, an enjoyable puzzle, with the odd bit of tough vocabulary. (After seeing “Dude” and “tenpin” bowler in the surface readings, I was hoping for a Big Lebowski theme, but I can’t spot any other references…)
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 26 Comments »
Posted by Uncle Yap on 11th March 2010
Monday Prize Crossword from 1 March 2010
A not-too-difficult week-opening puzzle from Crux … the Monday FT series is eminently suitable for beginners to cryptic crosswords to cut their teeth on. On my part, I shall continue to make my blogs simple and comprehensive to guide the newbies.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 2 Comments »
Posted by Pete Maclean on 11th March 2010
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of February 27
The nominees for best charade are 17A, 18A, 21A and 8D. And the winner is 8D! For best anagram or anagram-combination, the nominees are 9A, 14A and 3D. And the award goes to 9A. Finally, 9A, 8D and 27D are nominated for best overall clue. And the gong goes to 27D!!!
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 6 Comments »