Saturday Prize Crossword – Independent 7333 by Anax
Posted by nmsindy on April 23rd, 2010
Very unusual and impressive puzzle, this, which I found somewhat easier than previous Indy puzzles by Anax, solving time, 44 mins. One or two I’m not fully sure of, though am reasonably confident.
* = anagram < = reversed
ACROSS
1 SHE-D (get rid of) EVIL (the wrong) Liked this a lot
6 SIC (like this) around TO &lit a wonderful clue
9 F ROM This has to be right from the theme of the puzzle – I think the definition is ‘off’ with the F = loud Not sure about the rest “Loud music switched off” It may be MOR (middle of the road) reversing as a type of music, but not sure about that at all.
10 PUT TO SHAME “Naked child painted make-believe earth’s eclipse” The other one I’m not sure of – think the definition is ‘eclipse’ and the ‘naked child painted’ = PUTTO this leaves the make-believe earth = shame perhaps but do not see it so far.
11 AT ARR in CH CATARRH
12 ABROAD BRO in AA Don’t
13 KRIS Definition ‘sharp, this’ (a knife) S IRK (needle) all reversed. Clever use of ‘needle’
14 MERSEYSIDE (I see my reds)* This refers to Liverpool FC, who play in red.
17 DIVE BOMBER I’VE and (B MOB reversed) in DER (the German)
19 LOGO Lo-go
21 COVERS delivery units = overs (cricket) C = around
23 LATVIAN A TV in NAIL (reversed)
25 REAR (back) RANGED (garden)*
26 RISE IS in RE
27 STYLE “Something” = style ST (street = way) YLE = Ely (see) reversed
28 TA’LL NESS
DOWN
2 HI RE CAR (racer)<
3 DEMITASSE DEMISE around T(temperature) AS (while)
4 VIPER VIP = lion rampant ‘on’ = re upwards as in heraldry, I think.
5 LET THERE BE LIGHT Most unusual, this. Listing those answers out gives the clue “Latvian tallness covers rise early command from Genesis” giving the wordplay LETT followed by REBEL in HEIGHT. Impressive idea indeed. Genesis is the first book of the Old Testament.
6 SLOGANEER S (shilling) (one large)* sloganeer = coin (vb)
7 OTHER THÉ (tea in French) in OR
8 COMMA ND the “,” is part of the wordplay here
13 KID clocK I’D good punning on ‘wind up’
14 MOONSCAPE (SO CAN)* in MOPE
15 SOLDIER ON (plug away) R (resistance) in (SOLENOID)*
16 E.G. O
18 ISOMERS SOME in IRS US Internal Revenue Service
20 GENESIS G and I in (SENSE)*
22 EARLY PEARLY less P
24 TIDAL ID (papers) into TAL(e)
April 23rd, 2010 at 3:52 am
In 10ac: make-believe=SHAM and earth=E
April 23rd, 2010 at 6:19 am
One of the most enjoyable puzzles I have solved for some time. I thought 5dn was breathtaking and most appropriate for a crossword. 5dn gave me my last entry, 9ac, which I parsed as you did with F and a reversal of MOR. Also agree with Matthew re 10ac.
April 23rd, 2010 at 12:40 pm
Ingenious and entertaining! I think I once read a comment from Anax, stating that he found short words hard to clue – well there were plenty of excellent examples here.
April 23rd, 2010 at 3:40 pm
Marvellous puzzle crowned by that genuine jaw-dropping moment when all became clear. First time I’ve ever seen the like. Wish I’d thought of it.
April 23rd, 2010 at 6:06 pm
Agree very strongly. Nice work from the hugely talented fellow.
April 23rd, 2010 at 10:58 pm
Many thanks to all for your kind comments. Not many of them, admittedly, but for once I’m sort of grateful. Generally, the more contentious a puzzle the more comments are made about it, and I had some fears that the “build your own clue” idea might elicit some “how dare you?” responses.
April 23rd, 2010 at 11:40 pm
I think the number of comments tend to be quite a bit higher on weekday puzzles. Not quite sure why, but my guess is that people have more time to work out the possibilities with a weekend puzzle with some days before entries are due so there is less uncertainty and more time to wait till the solution is given. My solving experience with this puzzle may have been slightly different to some others, in that, esp with the enumeration, I saw the LET THERE BE BE LIGHT possibility almost straightaway and pencilled it in, only understanding why quite a bit later.
April 24th, 2010 at 1:22 am
Just saw the comments on the RSS feed for this.
I agree with nms about why so few comments.
After a week, things get forgotten, but I’d like to say this was an excellent puzzle, very original, and I hope anax keeps it up.
He’s rapidly becoming one of my favourite setters.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:02 am
I was confident that most people, having recovered their lower jaw from the ground, would appreciate 5 Down in all its glory. Thanks, Anax. I’m always keen to include the innovative in the Indy puzzles.
April 24th, 2010 at 12:24 pm
To my mind the Indie Saturday puzzles are the finest series of blocked-grid crosswords around. In a week when at least two puzzles elsewhere have been generally slated for being too easy, I wonder why more people don’t treat themselves to the Saturday Indie and perhaps save the crossword for one of those weekdays when they feel the need for more challenging fare (apologies to overseas solvers who might not have this option).
April 24th, 2010 at 7:25 pm
I suspect the lack of comments is partly due to th puzzle being a week behind online.
I’m reluctant to comment on this puzzle as anax has made it clear that he doesn’t welcome criticism.
I’m not as sure that this puzzle is as innovative as some think though.
April 24th, 2010 at 9:02 pm
Sidey
With every respect to you, I think that’s a tad unfair. Criticism isn’t just something I welcome – it’s something I relish; it’s criticism that helps me to improve as a setter.
My comment above wasn’t about criticism. Before submitting the puzzle I contacted a good friend and highly experienced solver to ask him what he thought of the concept of using a clue consisting entirely of numerical references to grid answers, because I was very unsure about its fairness. He thought it possible there could be a 50/50 split between “love it” and “hate it”, which is pretty much what I relayed to Eimi upon submission.
There was a never a claim that the device was innovative; OK, I hadn’t seen it before, but that counts for little. The responses here suggest that many found it original and enjoyable, and my comment above merely reflects my relief that the idea appears not to have backfired.
April 24th, 2010 at 9:32 pm
To be honest, I’d be surprised if anyone could have thought of those numbers in the clue as being anything else than the relevant clue numbers.
I don’t think it made the puzzle much harder as there were normal clues for answers at all those numbers.
April 24th, 2010 at 10:38 pm
anax I wasn’t referring to your comment above.