<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24,993 (Sat 24 April)/Paul &#8211; Fast food</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-108069</link>
		<dc:creator>crosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 07:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-108069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Huw Powell
I hesitate to give an explanation as I&#039;m a relative newcomer, but the clueing of &quot;unfair&quot; is, in fact, very fair. (1) A redhead is not fair-haired (therefore UNfair)and (2)when we think something is not fair, we say &quot;I think that&#039;s a bit thick&quot;. Hope that has helped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Huw Powell<br />
I hesitate to give an explanation as I&#8217;m a relative newcomer, but the clueing of &#8220;unfair&#8221; is, in fact, very fair. (1) A redhead is not fair-haired (therefore UNfair)and (2)when we think something is not fair, we say &#8220;I think that&#8217;s a bit thick&#8221;. Hope that has helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks rightback.

This was superb! Easy but richly rewarding. 35&#039; to complete.

&#039;Ted Dexter&#039; was stupendous. &#039;Lancashire Hotpot&#039;, &#039;Tenderloin&#039; &amp; &#039;Bangers and Mash&#039; utterly scrumptious.

Only wished you could have used a different, less graphic example for the use of a club rb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks rightback.</p>
<p>This was superb! Easy but richly rewarding. 35&#8242; to complete.</p>
<p>&#8216;Ted Dexter&#8217; was stupendous. &#8216;Lancashire Hotpot&#8217;, &#8216;Tenderloin&#8217; &amp; &#8216;Bangers and Mash&#8217; utterly scrumptious.</p>
<p>Only wished you could have used a different, less graphic example for the use of a club rb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107961</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interesting and fun... in 75&#039; I was down to 3 missing answers.  Some in depth research into the history of cricket got me 15d, leaving 27a (although I do have &quot;swisher&quot; written next to the clue, I couldn&#039;t prove it to myself either literally or cryptically) and 20d.  While I see how one could get 27a &quot;fairly&quot;, 20 makes no sense to me at all.  But the rest of the puzzle was very enjoyable, the food theme requiring some odd research.  I went to blightynet.co.uk to suss out 3/19, since I knew they had lists of traditional British food!

Thanks for the blog as always.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting and fun&#8230; in 75&#8242; I was down to 3 missing answers.  Some in depth research into the history of cricket got me 15d, leaving 27a (although I do have &#8220;swisher&#8221; written next to the clue, I couldn&#8217;t prove it to myself either literally or cryptically) and 20d.  While I see how one could get 27a &#8220;fairly&#8221;, 20 makes no sense to me at all.  But the rest of the puzzle was very enjoyable, the food theme requiring some odd research.  I went to blightynet.co.uk to suss out 3/19, since I knew they had lists of traditional British food!</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FumbleFingers</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107914</link>
		<dc:creator>FumbleFingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 20:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks, rightback, for a few derivations &amp; thematic allusions I didn&#039;t get.

Re &#039;White = W&#039; in 9a ROWAN - interested to see you say &quot;isn’t allowed in The Times, nor advanced/barred cryptics because it isn’t in Chambers&quot;

I wouldn&#039;t want to be dismissive of anyone who solved this puzzle in 5 minutes, but seriously - are you saying Hugh Stephenson, Richard Browne, etc. actually codify such rules? And if they do, that Araucaria, Paul, etc. would feel bound by them?

I&#039;m a great fan of Chambers - great dictionary, and the only credible for an Official Scrabble Wordlist (playing in the UK - it obviously won&#039;t do for international contests).

Apart from proper nouns, Mephisto sticks to Chambers for answer words - but let&#039;s face it, no-one could complete the puzzle without knowing they&#039;re in there somewhere! Mephisto goes out of his way to include the neologisms whenever there&#039;s a new edition!

There have to be some rules in any sport, including cruciverbalism. But setting up one dictionary as the final arbiter of lexical conventions &amp; validity seems to me more than a bit OTT. Valid English is whatever people say - so let the people speak!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, rightback, for a few derivations &amp; thematic allusions I didn&#8217;t get.</p>
<p>Re &#8216;White = W&#8217; in 9a ROWAN &#8211; interested to see you say &#8220;isn’t allowed in The Times, nor advanced/barred cryptics because it isn’t in Chambers&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want to be dismissive of anyone who solved this puzzle in 5 minutes, but seriously &#8211; are you saying Hugh Stephenson, Richard Browne, etc. actually codify such rules? And if they do, that Araucaria, Paul, etc. would feel bound by them?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a great fan of Chambers &#8211; great dictionary, and the only credible for an Official Scrabble Wordlist (playing in the UK &#8211; it obviously won&#8217;t do for international contests).</p>
<p>Apart from proper nouns, Mephisto sticks to Chambers for answer words &#8211; but let&#8217;s face it, no-one could complete the puzzle without knowing they&#8217;re in there somewhere! Mephisto goes out of his way to include the neologisms whenever there&#8217;s a new edition!</p>
<p>There have to be some rules in any sport, including cruciverbalism. But setting up one dictionary as the final arbiter of lexical conventions &amp; validity seems to me more than a bit OTT. Valid English is whatever people say &#8211; so let the people speak!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smutchin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107913</link>
		<dc:creator>smutchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 20:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t a swisher a headmaster&#039;s cane? So called for the sound it makes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a swisher a headmaster&#8217;s cane? So called for the sound it makes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107912</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of things that spring to my mind right now.
One would be S (someone?), the other M (me?)? :)
And what about M&amp;S? :)

Thanks, Mr Beaver, I get it [btw, I&#039;m no expert either]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of things that spring to my mind right now.<br />
One would be S (someone?), the other M (me?)? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And what about M&amp;S? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks, Mr Beaver, I get it [btw, I'm no expert either]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 19:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sil - I think S&amp;M stands for Sadism &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; Masochism.  Arguably more accurate than &#039;sado-masochism&#039; as one participant would be S and the other M. Or so I suppose - I&#039;m no expert, I hasten to say!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sil &#8211; I think S&amp;M stands for Sadism <b>and</b> Masochism.  Arguably more accurate than &#8216;sado-masochism&#8217; as one participant would be S and the other M. Or so I suppose &#8211; I&#8217;m no expert, I hasten to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrc</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107906</link>
		<dc:creator>rrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It takes me more than five minutes to read the clues let alone answer them.   Very enjoyable crossword with some great clues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes me more than five minutes to read the clues let alone answer them.   Very enjoyable crossword with some great clues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107900</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, rightback. Fast food, indeed! However did you solve it in five minutes??

I got SWISHER early on and it didn&#039;t particularly bother me. My hold-up was having FAN BELT at 1ac, even tho I thought it was wrong, but I eventually corrected it.

Very enjoyable puzzle and nothing seemed forced. I liked the food theme too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, rightback. Fast food, indeed! However did you solve it in five minutes??</p>
<p>I got SWISHER early on and it didn&#8217;t particularly bother me. My hold-up was having FAN BELT at 1ac, even tho I thought it was wrong, but I eventually corrected it.</p>
<p>Very enjoyable puzzle and nothing seemed forced. I liked the food theme too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tokyo Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/01/guardian-24993-sat-24-aprilpaul-fast-food/#comment-107899</link>
		<dc:creator>Tokyo Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17031#comment-107899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks rightback.  This was an enjoyable solve with a few that took a while.  I was very happy to enter Swisher since I didn&#039;t know the author and wasn&#039;t sure where Cornwall was until I checked both.  It is only recently that I seem to be consistently able to finish a Prize crossword at one sitting.  Fifteensquared must be a good influence (maybe motivator?)

BTW - I think you inadvertently substituted 5dn for 4dn/5ac - BLACK PUDDING.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks rightback.  This was an enjoyable solve with a few that took a while.  I was very happy to enter Swisher since I didn&#8217;t know the author and wasn&#8217;t sure where Cornwall was until I checked both.  It is only recently that I seem to be consistently able to finish a Prize crossword at one sitting.  Fifteensquared must be a good influence (maybe motivator?)</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I think you inadvertently substituted 5dn for 4dn/5ac &#8211; BLACK PUDDING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
