Comments on: Financial Times 13,388 / Jason http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/financial-times-13388-jason/ Never knowingly undersolved. Tue, 21 May 2013 09:21:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Macca http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/financial-times-13388-jason/#comment-109268 Macca Tue, 18 May 2010 23:25:36 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17490#comment-109268 Ah, I see. I’ve heard of the ‘tube’ for TV but not the ‘boob’ bit. There you go.

Thanks.

]]> By: Rishi http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/financial-times-13388-jason/#comment-109213 Rishi Tue, 18 May 2010 11:07:04 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17490#comment-109213 Macca
I forgot to tell you that it has nothing to do with any ‘hot, sexy’ dress.

]]> By: Rishi http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/financial-times-13388-jason/#comment-109206 Rishi Tue, 18 May 2010 10:16:24 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17490#comment-109206 Hostess in boob tube? I say!

As mentioned above, it’s a double definition.

The second definition is “I say”. One who says is an ANNOUNCER.

The first definition is a hostess on a TV programme, ‘boob tube’ being American slang for a TV set. Otherwise known as ANNOUNCER.

]]> By: Macca http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/financial-times-13388-jason/#comment-109191 Macca Tue, 18 May 2010 04:48:24 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17490#comment-109191 Hi Agentzero,
could someone explain the ‘hostess in boob tube’ bit of 3dn ?

]]>