<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,013 &#8211; Gordius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109281</link>
		<dc:creator>crosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 06:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was born and brought up in Lancashire, where we wore pumps for PE. When I went to teach in Bristol, a boy in my form informed me one day that he had lost his daps. I was at a loss and didn&#039;t like to ask too many questions. I have lived abroad for several decades and this blog has brought back that memory!
I agree with Ian that H Mantel is particularly well known since Wolf Hall, but would add that she has been a very respected writer for many years. I love her books and was shocked to hear her referred to as &quot;painfully obscure&quot;!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was born and brought up in Lancashire, where we wore pumps for PE. When I went to teach in Bristol, a boy in my form informed me one day that he had lost his daps. I was at a loss and didn&#8217;t like to ask too many questions. I have lived abroad for several decades and this blog has brought back that memory!<br />
I agree with Ian that H Mantel is particularly well known since Wolf Hall, but would add that she has been a very respected writer for many years. I love her books and was shocked to hear her referred to as &#8220;painfully obscure&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109267</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, tupu and scarpia.
Right or wrong, I think I opt for tupu&#039;s version.
[w+inkle seemed to me nonsense anyway]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, tupu and scarpia.<br />
Right or wrong, I think I opt for tupu&#8217;s version.<br />
[w+inkle seemed to me nonsense anyway]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109263</link>
		<dc:creator>scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sil

I think the phrase that best fits is &#039;to winkle out the truth&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sil</p>
<p>I think the phrase that best fits is &#8216;to winkle out the truth&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109262</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi again Sil
Have just checked wikipedia &#039;winklepickers&#039; which supports that idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again Sil<br />
Have just checked wikipedia &#8216;winklepickers&#8217; which supports that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109260</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi sil
As mentioned above, I feel it must be winkle out (rather than w+inkle). I have some vague memory that the term draws on the difficulty of prising the edible winkle shell-fish out of its shell. The term winkle-picker for long narrow shoes must, I think, be from a tool for that purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi sil<br />
As mentioned above, I feel it must be winkle out (rather than w+inkle). I have some vague memory that the term draws on the difficulty of prising the edible winkle shell-fish out of its shell. The term winkle-picker for long narrow shoes must, I think, be from a tool for that purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrots</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109258</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ho Hum....denied a second pinta at lunchtime by finishing it (with guesses) two-thirds of the way through the first (and last).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ho Hum&#8230;.denied a second pinta at lunchtime by finishing it (with guesses) two-thirds of the way through the first (and last).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109255</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog Uncle Yap.
I enjoyed the puzzle but only just now got round to checking out 15sqd.
As always it&#039;s a pleasure to have other solvers&#039; thoughts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog Uncle Yap.<br />
I enjoyed the puzzle but only just now got round to checking out 15sqd.<br />
As always it&#8217;s a pleasure to have other solvers&#8217; thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109252</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 21:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re the the suggestion that DAP may be regional, it never made it to Yorkshire when I was of an age to go to such places as gyms. As suggested, pumps or plimsolls were the words.

Trunk call? School boy joke? Not sure how that comment was meant. There were certainly school boy jokes, but the term itself was not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the the suggestion that DAP may be regional, it never made it to Yorkshire when I was of an age to go to such places as gyms. As suggested, pumps or plimsolls were the words.</p>
<p>Trunk call? School boy joke? Not sure how that comment was meant. There were certainly school boy jokes, but the term itself was not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, 4d was for us the last one to go, um, in.
I don&#039;t want an explanation for the second part of the clue [ :)], but the posts above and Uncle Yap&#039;s splendid blog didn&#039;t fully unravel the first part of it. Is it &#039;winkle out&#039; or &#039;w+inkle out&#039;? I know what &#039;winkle out&#039; means [and &#039;inkle&#039; (a noun, not a verb?)], but why &#039;with difficulty unmask&#039;?

Another one we didn&#039;t understand was OMEN (23d), but thanks to Colin (#13) we know it now. Agree, very clever.
And only after reading the blog we saw that E (in 1d) stood for &#039;East&#039;, rather nice.

Less convinced we were by 20d (MONTE).
No problem finding the answer, and getting the construction.
But my PinC had mixed feelings with &#039;swaps ends&#039; for swapping the last two letters. 
For her &#039;ends&#039; represents the first and the last letter, and I must say, de facto [obscure, isn&#039;t it?] I think she&#039;s right.

We agree with Colin (again!, #13) re the definition in 22d:
&#039;for dishing out the hard stuff&#039; describing a noun, well, so-so.

Sometimes I think, setters shouldn&#039;t try cryptic definitions, unless they are really good at it (like Rufus). INDIAN INK (6d), MARCHING ORDERS (8ac) and TRUNK CALL (18ac) were just very poor.
We decided to call them from now on Craptic Definitions.

But to be fair to Gordius, there were nice things as well.
We thought the &#039;1 down&#039; in 25ac was great [it misled my PinC!], as was 11,17ac (MANTEL PIECE). Didn&#039;t know this spelling of &#039;Mantel&#039;, but it&#039;s OK, of course.
[I got this clue very quickly, thinking of that great Clifford T Ward album (with the same name, but LE) from the seventies - just recently released on cd for the first time].

However, all in all, we found it a bit laborous.
In his previous crosswords Gordius was on the way up again, but this one lacked sparkle - that is, for us.

Whatever&#039;s next, surely nót the Crossword of the Week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, 4d was for us the last one to go, um, in.<br />
I don&#8217;t want an explanation for the second part of the clue [ <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ], but the posts above and Uncle Yap&#8217;s splendid blog didn&#8217;t fully unravel the first part of it. Is it &#8216;winkle out&#8217; or &#8216;w+inkle out&#8217;? I know what &#8216;winkle out&#8217; means [and 'inkle' (a noun, not a verb?)], but why &#8216;with difficulty unmask&#8217;?</p>
<p>Another one we didn&#8217;t understand was OMEN (23d), but thanks to Colin (#13) we know it now. Agree, very clever.<br />
And only after reading the blog we saw that E (in 1d) stood for &#8216;East&#8217;, rather nice.</p>
<p>Less convinced we were by 20d (MONTE).<br />
No problem finding the answer, and getting the construction.<br />
But my PinC had mixed feelings with &#8216;swaps ends&#8217; for swapping the last two letters.<br />
For her &#8216;ends&#8217; represents the first and the last letter, and I must say, de facto [obscure, isn't it?] I think she&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>We agree with Colin (again!, #13) re the definition in 22d:<br />
&#8216;for dishing out the hard stuff&#8217; describing a noun, well, so-so.</p>
<p>Sometimes I think, setters shouldn&#8217;t try cryptic definitions, unless they are really good at it (like Rufus). INDIAN INK (6d), MARCHING ORDERS (8ac) and TRUNK CALL (18ac) were just very poor.<br />
We decided to call them from now on Craptic Definitions.</p>
<p>But to be fair to Gordius, there were nice things as well.<br />
We thought the &#8217;1 down&#8217; in 25ac was great [it misled my PinC!], as was 11,17ac (MANTEL PIECE). Didn&#8217;t know this spelling of &#8216;Mantel&#8217;, but it&#8217;s OK, of course.<br />
[I got this clue very quickly, thinking of that great Clifford T Ward album (with the same name, but LE) from the seventies - just recently released on cd for the first time].</p>
<p>However, all in all, we found it a bit laborous.<br />
In his previous crosswords Gordius was on the way up again, but this one lacked sparkle &#8211; that is, for us.</p>
<p>Whatever&#8217;s next, surely nót the Crossword of the Week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/18/guardian-25013-gordius/#comment-109248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17492#comment-109248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It ain&#039;t necessarily so. Googling &quot;Indian ink&quot; produces 429,000 responses. &quot;India ink&quot; gives 673,000. Anyway, they&#039;re both misnomers. The stuff originated in China.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It ain&#8217;t necessarily so. Googling &#8220;Indian ink&#8221; produces 429,000 responses. &#8220;India ink&#8221; gives 673,000. Anyway, they&#8217;re both misnomers. The stuff originated in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
