<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,394 / Neo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109841</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks, as ever, for superb blog and kind comments. I am a bit 24 ac after a particularly awful gig in sunny W1, but I think you&#039;ve dotted the Is and crossed the Ts with great aplomb. 

I shall now most unsteadily to bed, to sleep off all the nonsense I&#039;ve just said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, as ever, for superb blog and kind comments. I am a bit 24 ac after a particularly awful gig in sunny W1, but I think you&#8217;ve dotted the Is and crossed the Ts with great aplomb. </p>
<p>I shall now most unsteadily to bed, to sleep off all the nonsense I&#8217;ve just said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109828</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Er, btw, the “how can we give a short solution a quite complicated clue” phrase is referring to 23ac (ERNST).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, btw, the “how can we give a short solution a quite complicated clue” phrase is referring to 23ac (ERNST).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109827</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to join the Chorus singing that this was a fine crossword.
But, indeed, slightly easier than usually for a Neo.
In our AWS (After Work Session) we first completed Gordius, but couldn&#039;t resist the Temptation of Neo [nice film title :)].
Some (almost) giveaways today like 5d (MINUTE), 12ac (BETTER OFF) or 27ac (GENESIS), but still enough inventive clueing to make this puzzle enjoyable.
Like others, we were Laughing With The Lambs at 20ad [another nice film title :)], but also very impressed by the appropriate surface of 16d (DAUNTING), the anagrind in 11ac, the &quot;how can we give a short solution a quite complicated clue&quot; and the misleading use of &#039;filthy&#039; [could have been a anagrind for &#039;drain&#039; leading to, for example, Indra].

Of a recent Crux I said that it was a happy marriage between clever construction [you can see that there&#039;s some thought put in the clues] and accessibility. 
This Neo was another fine example.
Good puzzle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to join the Chorus singing that this was a fine crossword.<br />
But, indeed, slightly easier than usually for a Neo.<br />
In our AWS (After Work Session) we first completed Gordius, but couldn&#8217;t resist the Temptation of Neo [nice film title <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ].<br />
Some (almost) giveaways today like 5d (MINUTE), 12ac (BETTER OFF) or 27ac (GENESIS), but still enough inventive clueing to make this puzzle enjoyable.<br />
Like others, we were Laughing With The Lambs at 20ad [another nice film title <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ], but also very impressed by the appropriate surface of 16d (DAUNTING), the anagrind in 11ac, the &#8220;how can we give a short solution a quite complicated clue&#8221; and the misleading use of &#8216;filthy&#8217; [could have been a anagrind for 'drain' leading to, for example, Indra].</p>
<p>Of a recent Crux I said that it was a happy marriage between clever construction [you can see that there's some thought put in the clues] and accessibility.<br />
This Neo was another fine example.<br />
Good puzzle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109818</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks again Gaufrid.
I thought this a very good puzzle with some very clever wordplay,especially liked 20 down.
Didn&#039;t spot the cricket reference in 8 across,somehow thought that Number Ten might be the second last house in Downing Street!
Ichneumon is actually named after a mythical beast,as mentioned in Pliny the Elder&#039;s Natural History.It would cover itself in layers of mud,letting each bake hard before applying the next,so forming a kind of armour.Thus protected it would wait for a chance to grab it&#039;s foe(a snake or a crocodile) by the throat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again Gaufrid.<br />
I thought this a very good puzzle with some very clever wordplay,especially liked 20 down.<br />
Didn&#8217;t spot the cricket reference in 8 across,somehow thought that Number Ten might be the second last house in Downing Street!<br />
Ichneumon is actually named after a mythical beast,as mentioned in Pliny the Elder&#8217;s Natural History.It would cover itself in layers of mud,letting each bake hard before applying the next,so forming a kind of armour.Thus protected it would wait for a chance to grab it&#8217;s foe(a snake or a crocodile) by the throat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walruss</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109804</link>
		<dc:creator>walruss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This crossword sat very nicely somewhere between the other two, Guardian and Independent, I&#039;ve managed to complete today. Clues read well and were often funny. Favourite bit of clueing is &#039;Lamb&#039;s comments&#039;!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This crossword sat very nicely somewhere between the other two, Guardian and Independent, I&#8217;ve managed to complete today. Clues read well and were often funny. Favourite bit of clueing is &#8216;Lamb&#8217;s comments&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109802</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi smiffy
Your assumption regarding &#039;barking&#039; is correct. Chambers defines it as &quot;adjective (slang) barking mad&quot; and Collins gives &quot;ADJECTIVE mad; crazy ADVERB (intensifier) barking mad&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi smiffy<br />
Your assumption regarding &#8216;barking&#8217; is correct. Chambers defines it as &#8220;adjective (slang) barking mad&#8221; and Collins gives &#8220;ADJECTIVE mad; crazy ADVERB (intensifier) barking mad&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109801</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed smiffy it can. Like many colloquialisms &quot;barking mad&quot; has been (or often is, at any rate) shortened to just &quot;barking&quot;. It shouldn&#039;t be long before &quot;end of story&quot; appears in a puzzle in its &quot;end of&quot; form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed smiffy it can. Like many colloquialisms &#8220;barking mad&#8221; has been (or often is, at any rate) shortened to just &#8220;barking&#8221;. It shouldn&#8217;t be long before &#8220;end of story&#8221; appears in a puzzle in its &#8220;end of&#8221; form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smiffy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109799</link>
		<dc:creator>smiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed that this was a fun puzzle - even allowing for the exotic voyage of discovery into the realms of mongoose-hood.

One question, on something that I&#039;ve now seen crop up several times in recent months.  Is &quot;barking&quot; really a valid anagrind? i.e. can it still mean crazy, as a standlone word, when not accompanied with the suffix &quot;mad&quot;.  I&#039;m increasingly out of touch with UK vernacular usage, so maybe the two words of the phrase are now synonymous...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that this was a fun puzzle &#8211; even allowing for the exotic voyage of discovery into the realms of mongoose-hood.</p>
<p>One question, on something that I&#8217;ve now seen crop up several times in recent months.  Is &#8220;barking&#8221; really a valid anagrind? i.e. can it still mean crazy, as a standlone word, when not accompanied with the suffix &#8220;mad&#8221;.  I&#8217;m increasingly out of touch with UK vernacular usage, so maybe the two words of the phrase are now synonymous&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109786</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyable puzzle that was quite tough, I thought.  I took esp liked TIRED, also MAIDEN, UGLY AS SIN, BANANAS.   6D was most definitely new to me, but got it when I&#039;d established it looked like an anagram, and I had most of the crossing letters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable puzzle that was quite tough, I thought.  I took esp liked TIRED, also MAIDEN, UGLY AS SIN, BANANAS.   6D was most definitely new to me, but got it when I&#8217;d established it looked like an anagram, and I had most of the crossing letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/25/financial-times-13394-neo/#comment-109784</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17680#comment-109784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for another excellent blog Gaufrid. Like you I found this (mostly) easier than the slightly naughty one&#039;s usual fare although the SW corner held me up; glad I solved it though for the delicious 24a.

6d would have been a sticking point too had it not been for one of my own (recently abandoned) puzzles where this was a possible answer for a 9-letter slot; I kept looking at it thinking &quot;You&#039;d never get away with it - too obscure&quot;. Damn instinct, wrong again.

Great puzzle, Neo old bean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another excellent blog Gaufrid. Like you I found this (mostly) easier than the slightly naughty one&#8217;s usual fare although the SW corner held me up; glad I solved it though for the delicious 24a.</p>
<p>6d would have been a sticking point too had it not been for one of my own (recently abandoned) puzzles where this was a possible answer for a 9-letter slot; I kept looking at it thinking &#8220;You&#8217;d never get away with it &#8211; too obscure&#8221;. Damn instinct, wrong again.</p>
<p>Great puzzle, Neo old bean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
