<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,024 &#8211; Rufus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D&#38;G</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110340</link>
		<dc:creator>D&#38;G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 19:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having just been reading the book, we couldn&#039;t move away from the idea that 6D should be Candide. Ho hum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just been reading the book, we couldn&#8217;t move away from the idea that 6D should be Candide. Ho hum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morpheus</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110339</link>
		<dc:creator>morpheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[those who don&#039;t know or who didn&#039;t look it up might like to know that leu is Romanian for lion, from Latin leo &quot;(from the image of a lion on a coin used in the late Ottoman Empire)&quot; to quote one source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those who don&#8217;t know or who didn&#8217;t look it up might like to know that leu is Romanian for lion, from Latin leo &#8220;(from the image of a lion on a coin used in the late Ottoman Empire)&#8221; to quote one source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110335</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bill. Many thanks for that - your comment seems to agree with my own late attempt at a gloss - and it is even possible to make some sense of the &#039;of&#039; as I suggest. &#039;Plants&#039; could be thought of as minimally cryptic in as much as it is given by the dictionaries as slang in this sense. But it is, I agree, a bit too simple for comfort.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill. Many thanks for that &#8211; your comment seems to agree with my own late attempt at a gloss &#8211; and it is even possible to make some sense of the &#8216;of&#8217; as I suggest. &#8216;Plants&#8217; could be thought of as minimally cryptic in as much as it is given by the dictionaries as slang in this sense. But it is, I agree, a bit too simple for comfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110331</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tupu @15: I think &quot;plant&quot; as the solution to 12a would not be cryptic at all. My reading of the clue, for what it&#039;s worth -- I lay claim to no wisdom as a solver -- was that blinding is the putting out, or extinguishing, of sight. Hence, &quot;puts out of sight&quot; = BLINDS. It could be argued that the &quot;of&quot; is superfluous but omitting it would ruin the reading of the clue. I&#039;m prepared to give Rufus the benefit of that particular doubt.


NeilW @14: You could be right but I&#039;d been hoping for something special today (even though Canada&#039;s May holiday was last Monday). I didn&#039;t mind Saturday&#039;s cryptic -- I&#039;m not discussing it, Gaufrid, honestly! -- though it wasn&#039;t as good as the previous three weekends. Certainly nothing extra-special about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tupu @15: I think &#8220;plant&#8221; as the solution to 12a would not be cryptic at all. My reading of the clue, for what it&#8217;s worth &#8212; I lay claim to no wisdom as a solver &#8212; was that blinding is the putting out, or extinguishing, of sight. Hence, &#8220;puts out of sight&#8221; = BLINDS. It could be argued that the &#8220;of&#8221; is superfluous but omitting it would ruin the reading of the clue. I&#8217;m prepared to give Rufus the benefit of that particular doubt.</p>
<p>NeilW @14: You could be right but I&#8217;d been hoping for something special today (even though Canada&#8217;s May holiday was last Monday). I didn&#8217;t mind Saturday&#8217;s cryptic &#8212; I&#8217;m not discussing it, Gaufrid, honestly! &#8212; though it wasn&#8217;t as good as the previous three weekends. Certainly nothing extra-special about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110330</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew or some other wise solver. Re 12a. Puts out of sight. In a slightly less self-critical mood than @5, I note that both COD and Chambers give slang meanings of &#039;plant&#039; as &#039;conceal&#039; and &#039;hide&#039; respectively with the sorts of connotations I mention. So it plants &#039;answers the question set&#039; at least, even if relatively simply and directly. 

I would be interested to see an analysis of the relation of the clue&#039;s exact wording to &#039;blinds&#039; - I can only think that &#039;puts out&#039; would be in the sense of &#039;extinguish&#039; and the &#039;of&#039; would then equal &#039;in the case of&#039; or &#039;with ref. to&#039; sight. But I may well be missing something else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew or some other wise solver. Re 12a. Puts out of sight. In a slightly less self-critical mood than @5, I note that both COD and Chambers give slang meanings of &#8216;plant&#8217; as &#8216;conceal&#8217; and &#8216;hide&#8217; respectively with the sorts of connotations I mention. So it plants &#8216;answers the question set&#8217; at least, even if relatively simply and directly. </p>
<p>I would be interested to see an analysis of the relation of the clue&#8217;s exact wording to &#8216;blinds&#8217; &#8211; I can only think that &#8216;puts out&#8217; would be in the sense of &#8216;extinguish&#8217; and the &#8216;of&#8217; would then equal &#8216;in the case of&#8217; or &#8216;with ref. to&#8217; sight. But I may well be missing something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilW</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110328</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Taylor,

rightback&#039;s comment referred, I guess, to this Saturday&#039;s &quot;special&quot; - a curate&#039;s egg if ever there was one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Taylor,</p>
<p>rightback&#8217;s comment referred, I guess, to this Saturday&#8217;s &#8220;special&#8221; &#8211; a curate&#8217;s egg if ever there was one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110318</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Derek @ 10
  Thought mathematicians would have stuck to sudoku! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek @ 10<br />
  Thought mathematicians would have stuck to sudoku! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110316</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thrown by leu/lei for a while, too. Apparently lei is the plural of leu (which I&#039;ve also seen spelled &quot;lev&quot;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thrown by leu/lei for a while, too. Apparently lei is the plural of leu (which I&#8217;ve also seen spelled &#8220;lev&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex M</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110315</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyable workout today after a couple of weeks away from the crossword. Not totally easy, but not too challenging. Didn&#039;t like 22d and 23d very much. Defeated by &#039;misere&#039;, even after recognising it probably related to a card game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable workout today after a couple of weeks away from the crossword. Not totally easy, but not too challenging. Didn&#8217;t like 22d and 23d very much. Defeated by &#8216;misere&#8217;, even after recognising it probably related to a card game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/05/31/guardian-25024-rufus/#comment-110314</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=17932#comment-110314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might have been easy, but it makes you smile, which is better than a hard earned scowl.

Minor quibbles, first the usual one, a ratio is an operation not a relationship. It may be used in a relationship, hence the confusion. Dictionaries are not compiled by mathematicians so don&#039;t quote them, they don&#039;t understand. But hey ho, it&#039;s such a common mistake that it won&#039;t stop the solving effort.

Secondly, I thought it was Leu not Lei. Wikipedia agrees, not that that says a great deal.

It seems several of us card players were slow to twig misere. My excuse is that it is a long time since I last played one of those games. Perhaps it was the same for others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might have been easy, but it makes you smile, which is better than a hard earned scowl.</p>
<p>Minor quibbles, first the usual one, a ratio is an operation not a relationship. It may be used in a relationship, hence the confusion. Dictionaries are not compiled by mathematicians so don&#8217;t quote them, they don&#8217;t understand. But hey ho, it&#8217;s such a common mistake that it won&#8217;t stop the solving effort.</p>
<p>Secondly, I thought it was Leu not Lei. Wikipedia agrees, not that that says a great deal.</p>
<p>It seems several of us card players were slow to twig misere. My excuse is that it is a long time since I last played one of those games. Perhaps it was the same for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
