<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,419 / Cinephile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112429</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid.
I enjoyed this,as I always do enjoy &quot;Cinecaria&quot; puzzles,but like others here felt 16 across was a liberty too far.
Thought 14 across and 19 down were very good and nice to see a mention for the Red Priest - apparently the nickname came from his hair colour.
Red Priest are also a very good British Baroque ensemble,who&#039;s flamboyant  performances are well worth catching.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid.<br />
I enjoyed this,as I always do enjoy &#8220;Cinecaria&#8221; puzzles,but like others here felt 16 across was a liberty too far.<br />
Thought 14 across and 19 down were very good and nice to see a mention for the Red Priest &#8211; apparently the nickname came from his hair colour.<br />
Red Priest are also a very good British Baroque ensemble,who&#8217;s flamboyant  performances are well worth catching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112420</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gaufrid, another good blog and another entertaining puzzle from Cinefile, despite the issues over character and tort.

This was one of those puzzles where the clues can get in the way.  Like you I started with the down clues but then filled in most of the across answers without reference to the clues.  Long anagrams are much easier when you start with answer! The O at then end of INTO was the key to 1,29A.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaufrid, another good blog and another entertaining puzzle from Cinefile, despite the issues over character and tort.</p>
<p>This was one of those puzzles where the clues can get in the way.  Like you I started with the down clues but then filled in most of the across answers without reference to the clues.  Long anagrams are much easier when you start with answer! The O at then end of INTO was the key to 1,29A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112401</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Andrew
My initial reaction to &#039;tort&#039; was the same as yours but part of its definition in COED is &quot;a wrongful act&quot; and with &#039;crime&#039; being defined as &quot;an action or activity considered to be wrong&quot; I decided that felony=tort was close enough not to quibble about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew<br />
My initial reaction to &#8216;tort&#8217; was the same as yours but part of its definition in COED is &#8220;a wrongful act&#8221; and with &#8216;crime&#8217; being defined as &#8220;an action or activity considered to be wrong&#8221; I decided that felony=tort was close enough not to quibble about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112396</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, and surely it&#039;s time to give EXCEL = XL = 40 a rest! It&#039;s not even a very accurate homophone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and surely it&#8217;s time to give EXCEL = XL = 40 a rest! It&#8217;s not even a very accurate homophone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112392</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid. I agree with you and Eileen about 16ac - a liberty too far in my opinion.

And another one - 21dn: a tort is a *civil* wrong (e.g. libel), so surely not a felony (= crime).

Apart from those this was good fun, though (as is often the case with such clues) I guessed 1/29 from the definition and enumeration and didn&#039;t bother to work out the anagram.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid. I agree with you and Eileen about 16ac &#8211; a liberty too far in my opinion.</p>
<p>And another one &#8211; 21dn: a tort is a *civil* wrong (e.g. libel), so surely not a felony (= crime).</p>
<p>Apart from those this was good fun, though (as is often the case with such clues) I guessed 1/29 from the definition and enumeration and didn&#8217;t bother to work out the anagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112379</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, Gaufrid.

Verb inflections, including the agent forms, -ER and -OR, have always caused  spelling problems for me. 
I remember once agonising for ages about the agent form of the verb NEGLECT to complete a crossword. My old edition of Collins gives -ER or -OR and, of course, I chose the &#039;wrong&#039; version. 
Why are alternative spellings not always included below the &#039;official&#039; solution of a crossword next day? 
Last week I was rather annoyed when my solution to 1ac in No 13,413 set by SLEUTH never got a mention: JIMCRACK for GIMCRACK.

My interpretation of 16ac today is very slightly different from yours. I think that Cinephile has simply added the usual agent form ending to the verb ACT, even although the resulting noun is not an accepted dictionary word - with a question mark to excuse the liberty taken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, Gaufrid.</p>
<p>Verb inflections, including the agent forms, -ER and -OR, have always caused  spelling problems for me.<br />
I remember once agonising for ages about the agent form of the verb NEGLECT to complete a crossword. My old edition of Collins gives -ER or -OR and, of course, I chose the &#8216;wrong&#8217; version.<br />
Why are alternative spellings not always included below the &#8216;official&#8217; solution of a crossword next day?<br />
Last week I was rather annoyed when my solution to 1ac in No 13,413 set by SLEUTH never got a mention: JIMCRACK for GIMCRACK.</p>
<p>My interpretation of 16ac today is very slightly different from yours. I think that Cinephile has simply added the usual agent form ending to the verb ACT, even although the resulting noun is not an accepted dictionary word &#8211; with a question mark to excuse the liberty taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112370</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Gaufrid.

Re 16ac: my reaction was similar to yours. I&#039;ve concluded that the question mark indicates your first interpretation - outrageous as it is! - because the second, assuming a spelling mistake, would mean the clue was a simple charade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gaufrid.</p>
<p>Re 16ac: my reaction was similar to yours. I&#8217;ve concluded that the question mark indicates your first interpretation &#8211; outrageous as it is! &#8211; because the second, assuming a spelling mistake, would mean the clue was a simple charade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferret</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/06/23/financial-times-13419-cinephile/#comment-112368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=18630#comment-112368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this quite straight forward apart from two things.....

I couldn&#039;t decipher where MIDST came from until your blog

Secondly, the Four Seasons man (3,6)...struggling to get Bob Gordio out of my mind!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this quite straight forward apart from two things&#8230;..</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t decipher where MIDST came from until your blog</p>
<p>Secondly, the Four Seasons man (3,6)&#8230;struggling to get Bob Gordio out of my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
