thanks for that link – that was one I didnt know. I feel that it may be useful in the future.

Now isn’t that interesting and no you are not being dim. On my screen the link doesn’t show any more – I deleted that section. Hmmm….. I will think about what is going on!

Am I beeing extraordinarily dim? I still don’t understand what you mean by editing your poat 34, which is still exactly the same as it was originally, including the link!

For the record, I [fortuitously] discovered 15² only two and a half years ago. It has been going for considerably longer than that and I certainly had no part in setting up either the site or the rules! I’m just an ordinary solver / commenter, like yourself, who became a blogger – something which is open to all contributors, as you will see in the ‘About Fifteensquared’ thread – and Gaufrid’s very timely Announcement!

I don’t think you are being over-sensitive and over-protective. You and your colleagues set this blog up as volunteers. You are entitled to set the rules. You had your vision of how the blog should run. There are other sites people can choose who would prefer different rules. I like this blog and get a lot of enjoyment and enlightenment out of it.

[I don't understand what you mean about editing your post, though: I think there are a number of us who would love to be able to do that but don't know how!]

Then perhaps it was intention that was misunderstood. I do come across on this blog (at least what I think are) spoilers from time to time. So I was just making a contribution to re-direct that. However I’m not the owner of the site so I shouldn’t have done it. I apologise for any offence I have caused.
I have now edited my earlier post and removed the link. (Gosh that was a new skill I acquired – so thank you for that.)
I trust that my comment at #34 is now acceptable.

I don’t want to be too 8dn, but as rightback indicated # 27, we just don’t reckon to do that kind of thing on this site.