<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,467 / Mudd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117929</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid for explaining the &quot;U&quot;.  I should have known, though I too rarely go to the cinema and in any case live in the US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid for explaining the &#8220;U&#8221;.  I should have known, though I too rarely go to the cinema and in any case live in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117892</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid.
 Maybe not Mudd&#039;s finest but I still enjoyed this puzzle and if his humour wasn&#039;t as much to the fore as usual,i still got a few smiles from it.
LATHE just about works for me - I think you can see what the setter is getting at even if it is a bit &quot;loose&quot;.
 25 across I enjoyed - that type of clue appeals to me.
Other favourites were IN BLOSSOM and TWIN TUB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid.<br />
 Maybe not Mudd&#8217;s finest but I still enjoyed this puzzle and if his humour wasn&#8217;t as much to the fore as usual,i still got a few smiles from it.<br />
LATHE just about works for me &#8211; I think you can see what the setter is getting at even if it is a bit &#8220;loose&#8221;.<br />
 25 across I enjoyed &#8211; that type of clue appeals to me.<br />
Other favourites were IN BLOSSOM and TWIN TUB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117873</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony
Film classifications. They&#039;ve probably changed since I last went to the cinema 30 years ago but I remember U and PG being two of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony<br />
Film classifications. They&#8217;ve probably changed since I last went to the cinema 30 years ago but I remember U and PG being two of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117870</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is &quot;U&quot; &quot;for all to see&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is &#8220;U&#8221; &#8220;for all to see&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117866</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi smiffy

Yes, 3dn was a good one - and, in these days of abdominoplasty, &amp; lit, surely? [I&#039;ve spared you a link to the video!]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi smiffy</p>
<p>Yes, 3dn was a good one &#8211; and, in these days of abdominoplasty, &amp; lit, surely? [I've spared you a link to the video!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smiffy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117861</link>
		<dc:creator>smiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I quite enjoyed the - admittedly genteel - vein of humour that permeated this one, with both 3D and 6D featuring as particular satisfying moments of solving enlightment.  Like Gaufrid, I thought that &#039;fluff on paper&#039; was an inspired def&#039;n, but one that deserved to be accompanied by far less arbitrary wordplay.

My own quibbles were centred around 24D (I don&#039;t think equates to &#039;more right&#039;, but the question mark probably acknowledges that) and 29A (not sufficiently wry as to merit an exclamation mark; and House of Orange or Mandarin Dynasty would be less tenuous puns, in my book).

Eileen, your Hollywood/LA point is perfectly valid.  But similar such examples of geographic/urban fuzziness seem to be well-established and accepted (e.g. NE/Newcastle, from either a postcode or compass-point perspective).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite enjoyed the &#8211; admittedly genteel &#8211; vein of humour that permeated this one, with both 3D and 6D featuring as particular satisfying moments of solving enlightment.  Like Gaufrid, I thought that &#8216;fluff on paper&#8217; was an inspired def&#8217;n, but one that deserved to be accompanied by far less arbitrary wordplay.</p>
<p>My own quibbles were centred around 24D (I don&#8217;t think equates to &#8216;more right&#8217;, but the question mark probably acknowledges that) and 29A (not sufficiently wry as to merit an exclamation mark; and House of Orange or Mandarin Dynasty would be less tenuous puns, in my book).</p>
<p>Eileen, your Hollywood/LA point is perfectly valid.  But similar such examples of geographic/urban fuzziness seem to be well-established and accepted (e.g. NE/Newcastle, from either a postcode or compass-point perspective).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/18/financial-times-13467-mudd/#comment-117797</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20064#comment-117797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Gaufrid.

In 28ac, I took &#039;to be concluded&#039; as a gerundive: &#039;requiring / deserving to be concluded&#039;, as in &#039;Gaufrid is to be commended for an admirable blog&#039;. ;-)

Is &#039;Hollywood&#039; really acceptable for LA?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gaufrid.</p>
<p>In 28ac, I took &#8216;to be concluded&#8217; as a gerundive: &#8216;requiring / deserving to be concluded&#8217;, as in &#8216;Gaufrid is to be commended for an admirable blog&#8217;. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Is &#8216;Hollywood&#8217; really acceptable for LA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
