<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,475 / Bradman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/#comment-118957</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20438#comment-118957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AB criticism accepted -- amazing what one misses, but I guess I was desperate to avoid a repeat of anag of BAD + OMEN! Thanks for all nice things said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AB criticism accepted &#8212; amazing what one misses, but I guess I was desperate to avoid a repeat of anag of BAD + OMEN! Thanks for all nice things said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/#comment-118933</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20438#comment-118933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi smiffy

Thanks for your perceptive comments. I agree on both counts.

There is also &#039;illegal&#039; to add to the &quot;wicked&quot; list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi smiffy</p>
<p>Thanks for your perceptive comments. I agree on both counts.</p>
<p>There is also &#8216;illegal&#8217; to add to the &#8220;wicked&#8221; list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smiffy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/#comment-118930</link>
		<dc:creator>smiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20438#comment-118930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Shuchi.  A fun Friday puzzle - I also had 17D as a stand-out.
There seems to be an impish vein running through the clues today, what with &#039;wickedness&#039;, &#039;sly person&#039;, &#039;rogue&#039; and &#039;mischief&#039; to complement MORTAL SIN.

My only quibble (and only because I probably, unfairly, hold Bradman to a slightly higher standard than others) is at 25A.  Isn&#039;t it a touch self-referential, given that the unabbreviated &#039;muscle&#039; is itself the abdominal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Shuchi.  A fun Friday puzzle &#8211; I also had 17D as a stand-out.<br />
There seems to be an impish vein running through the clues today, what with &#8216;wickedness&#8217;, &#8216;sly person&#8217;, &#8216;rogue&#8217; and &#8216;mischief&#8217; to complement MORTAL SIN.</p>
<p>My only quibble (and only because I probably, unfairly, hold Bradman to a slightly higher standard than others) is at 25A.  Isn&#8217;t it a touch self-referential, given that the unabbreviated &#8216;muscle&#8217; is itself the abdominal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/#comment-118904</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20438#comment-118904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Gaufrid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gaufrid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/27/financial-times-13475-bradman/#comment-118903</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20438#comment-118903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Suchi
In 14ac SOP is an abbreviation for &#039;significant other person (eg a cohabiting partner)&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Suchi<br />
In 14ac SOP is an abbreviation for &#8216;significant other person (eg a cohabiting partner)&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
