<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Eye/Cyclops 424 &#8211; Besmear drummer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beermagnet</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/#comment-119341</link>
		<dc:creator>beermagnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20486#comment-119341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bamberger: In 25A The &quot;Given&quot; is there to provide the structure to the clue in a way that makes a sensible and humourous surface reading.  Rewording you might get &quot;Good money fist gives a Prince&quot; but that doesn&#039;t make much sense.  I would agree that &quot;Good money, fist a Prince&quot; could work I think it is better the way it is.  

Gazza:  Rummer &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; a word, as John says.  The world would be rummer if occasional adjectives didn&#039;t take their comparative form.

John: Yes, I know &quot;Get knotted&quot; was a ref to &quot;tieing the knot&quot; but I can&#039;t see how else to define the clue type except as a Cryptic Def. The clue is certainly too misleading to call it a Single Def.  &quot;Get knotted, No&quot; might suffice for a Def. But what to do with the rest of the clue then?  Can &quot;carry on as you are&quot; also define &#039;Live in sin&#039;, making it a DD?  Am I missing something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bamberger: In 25A The &#8220;Given&#8221; is there to provide the structure to the clue in a way that makes a sensible and humourous surface reading.  Rewording you might get &#8220;Good money fist gives a Prince&#8221; but that doesn&#8217;t make much sense.  I would agree that &#8220;Good money, fist a Prince&#8221; could work I think it is better the way it is.  </p>
<p>Gazza:  Rummer <b>is</b> a word, as John says.  The world would be rummer if occasional adjectives didn&#8217;t take their comparative form.</p>
<p>John: Yes, I know &#8220;Get knotted&#8221; was a ref to &#8220;tieing the knot&#8221; but I can&#8217;t see how else to define the clue type except as a Cryptic Def. The clue is certainly too misleading to call it a Single Def.  &#8220;Get knotted, No&#8221; might suffice for a Def. But what to do with the rest of the clue then?  Can &#8220;carry on as you are&#8221; also define &#8216;Live in sin&#8217;, making it a DD?  Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/#comment-119250</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20486#comment-119250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[14D: Get knotted = Get married, so not a CD
16D: Rum = strange, twisted, wacky (old usage, such as &quot;She&#039;s a rum un&quot;, meaning a bit unusual in a negative sense)

I&#039;m probably showing my age here!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14D: Get knotted = Get married, so not a CD<br />
16D: Rum = strange, twisted, wacky (old usage, such as &#8220;She&#8217;s a rum un&#8221;, meaning a bit unusual in a negative sense)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably showing my age here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dozer</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/#comment-119232</link>
		<dc:creator>Dozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20486#comment-119232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got &#039;Crossword Setter&#039; and laughed, but couldn&#039;t manage any of the other clues!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got &#8216;Crossword Setter&#8217; and laughed, but couldn&#8217;t manage any of the other clues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaker</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/#comment-119192</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20486#comment-119192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed this one, but had to &#039;phone a friend&#039; for the top right corner, trying to force SCUD in for the long range threat somehow (EYE = C U refusing to leave my head and blinding me to all else) at the same time as getting IN POWER but not why it was right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this one, but had to &#8216;phone a friend&#8217; for the top right corner, trying to force SCUD in for the long range threat somehow (EYE = C U refusing to leave my head and blinding me to all else) at the same time as getting IN POWER but not why it was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazza</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/#comment-119173</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20486#comment-119173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 16d I thought the question mark was an indication that &quot;rummer&quot; is not a real word (in that sense). I agree with bamberger on 17a being excellent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 16d I thought the question mark was an indication that &#8220;rummer&#8221; is not a real word (in that sense). I agree with bamberger on 17a being excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/08/30/private-eyecyclops-424-besmear-drummer/#comment-119166</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=20486#comment-119166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25a I was torn between wordplay being &quot;grand&quot; for good money and as you have it, g + rand. What was the &quot;given&quot; doing there? 
Much easier than last one -loved 17a]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25a I was torn between wordplay being &#8220;grand&#8221; for good money and as you have it, g + rand. What was the &#8220;given&#8221; doing there?<br />
Much easier than last one -loved 17a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
